Measuring the impact of ICNIRP vs. stricter-than-ICNIRP exposure limits on QoS and EMF from cellular networks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Marloes Eeftens,et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.
[2] D. Mandrioli,et al. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague‐Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission , 2018, Environmental research.
[3] Gerardo Di Martino,et al. Planning 5G Networks Under EMF Constraints: State of the Art and Vision , 2018, IEEE Access.
[4] Nicola Blefari-Melazzi,et al. Not in My Neighborhood: A User Equipment Perspective of Cellular Planning Under Restrictive EMF Limits , 2019, IEEE Access.
[5] Wojtek J. Krzanowski,et al. Multivariate Analysis: Overview , 2005 .
[6] Guidelines Icnirp. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .
[7] Christian Wietfeld,et al. Empirical Analysis of the Impact of LTE Downlink Channel Indicators on the Uplink Connectivity , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).
[8] Niels Kuster,et al. Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's reverberation chamber exposure system , 2018, Bioelectromagnetics.