Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact

Abstract Some bibliometric research has been carried out in sport sciences, but compared with other disciplines there is still no intensive study at macro level, especially on international collaboration. This study attempts to observe the status and trend of international collaboration in sport sciences at macro level, and to look at its relationship with academic impact. 20,804 publications from 63 consistently issued journals belonging to the Sport Sciences category in Web of Science database in 2000–2001 and 2010–2011 were analyzed. The main objects include co-authorship links of country pairs, the share of international co-authored publications, tendency and “affinity” in collaboration, and citation impact of international publications. Differences between countries and periods were observed. There is a rapid increase of the share of international collaboration in sport sciences. In some countries the share is even above 2/3; Co-authorship networks imply some cultural, political or geographical factors for collaboration, and their changes exhibit some new trends; Selected countries have strong tendency in collaboration; International collaborated publications have a higher performance than domestic ones in citation impact. But gaps between countries are narrowing. International collaboration really intensified in this field. European, especially Nordic countries are very fond of collaboration and have gained outstanding performance as a partner. It is meaningful to further explore the underlying motivation behind international collaboration in sport science research.

[1]  N. Tsigilis,et al.  Impact factors of the sport sciences journals: Current trends, relative positions, and temporal stability , 2010 .

[2]  Jan Ulijn,et al.  Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Culture: The Interaction Between Technology, Progress and Economic Growth , 2004 .

[3]  J. A. Martínez-Morilla,et al.  PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA SOBRE CARDIOLOGÍA Y DEPORTE: RANKING DE REVISTAS (2010) Y EXCELENCIA , 2012 .

[4]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals , 2004, Scientometrics.

[6]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  The growing trend of scientific interest in sports science research , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[7]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  José Manuel Sánchez Santos,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Sport Economics Research , 2011 .

[9]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[10]  Chuanli Wang,et al.  International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.

[12]  Stephanie E. Hampton,et al.  Collaboration and Productivity in Scientific Synthesis , 2011 .

[13]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[14]  Rafael E. Bahamonde,et al.  TWENTY- FIVE YEAR TRENDS OF AUTHORSHIP AND SAMPLING IN ISBS PROCEEDINGS , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Discrete Choice Model , 2011 .

[16]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Scientometrics and the evaluation of European integration , 2009, ArXiv.

[17]  D. Serwer Science in Brazil. , 1992, Science.

[18]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[19]  Stefano Bonassi,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of literature in cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases rehabilitation: growing numbers, reducing impact factor. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  R. Coronado,et al.  Content and bibliometric analysis of articles published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. , 2011, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[21]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[22]  Marcel Dijkers International Collaboration and Communication in Rehabilitation Research , 2009 .

[23]  R. Aleixandre-Benavent,et al.  Consumption of anabolic steroids in sport, physical activity and as a drug of abuse: an analysis of the scientific literature and areas of research , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[24]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  D. Shilbury A Bibliometric Study of Citations to Sport Management and Marketing Journals , 2011 .

[26]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric indicators. A 32 country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact , 1985 .

[27]  Aurelia Modrego Rico,et al.  Public financing of cooperative R&D projects in Spain: the Concerted Projects under the National R&D Plan , 2001 .

[28]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology , 2011, Scientometrics.

[29]  Marina Dabić,et al.  Is There a Potential Impact of Research and Development (R&D) Policy on Health Care System Development in Croatia? , 2008 .

[30]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[31]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[32]  Catherine P. Ailes,et al.  Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers , 2002 .

[33]  Donald T. Hawkins,et al.  Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval systems: On-line bibliometric studies , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[34]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  J. Robertson-Wilson,et al.  Publishing Productivity in Sport Psychology 1970-2000: An Exploratory Examination of the Lotka-Price Law , 2003 .

[36]  G Grimby Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine: Looking back at 13 years as Editor-in-Chief , 2012 .

[37]  Tibor Braun,et al.  World Flash on Basic Research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[38]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[39]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  International collaboration in psychology is on the rise , 2010, Scientometrics.

[40]  G. Reid,et al.  A Documentary Analysis of Research Priorities in Disability Sport , 1998 .

[41]  Franco Franchignoni,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and core journals in physical and rehabilitation medicine. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[42]  Ignacio Martín,et al.  Bibliometric study (1922-2009) on rugby articles in research journals , 2013 .

[43]  Cédric Gossart,et al.  Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey , 2009, Scientometrics.

[44]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[45]  Mohammad Ali Jahani,et al.  Scientific production of Sports Science in Iran: A Scientometric Analysis , 2014, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[46]  Anastassios Pouris Fluorine research in South Africa and four benchmarking countries: Comparative mapping and assessment , 2007, Scientometrics.

[47]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[48]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[50]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989) , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[51]  Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of South American research in sports science from 1970 to 2012 , 2013 .

[52]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2004, Graph Drawing Software.

[53]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[54]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations , 2006, Scientometrics.

[55]  Gunnar Grimby Bibliometric indicators and international publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[56]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry , 2004, Scientometrics.

[57]  Claudine Sherrill,et al.  Scholarly Productivity in Adapted Physical Activity Pedagogy: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2001 .

[58]  Jun Hu,et al.  The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field , 2010, Scientometrics.

[59]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Paul J. Campbell,et al.  Patterns of Collaboration in Mathematical Research (Book) , 2003 .

[61]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[62]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[63]  Uri Miller,et al.  Is Research on Aging and Physical Activity Really Increasing? A Bibliometric Analysis , 1999 .

[64]  Javier Valenciano Valcárcel,et al.  La colaboración científi ca en el campo de las Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte en España , 2010 .

[65]  Stephen John Williams,et al.  A profile of sports science research (1983-2003). , 2007, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[66]  R. Benavent,et al.  Scientific literature analysis of Judo in Web of Science , 2013 .

[67]  Klaus Heinemann,et al.  25 Years of the INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR THE SOCIOLOGY OF SPORT — A Content Analysis , 1990 .

[68]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[69]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2000, Scientometrics.

[70]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[71]  Tibor Braun,et al.  International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985 , 1990, Scientometrics.

[72]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[73]  Donna L. Pastore,et al.  Collaboration in Sport Research: A Case From the Field , 2005 .