Production Performance of Four Pig Herds Infected With Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Using the “Load-Close-Exposure” Approach in China

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most important swine diseases causing enormous losses to pig producers all over the world. The intervention measure of “load-close-exposure” [interrupting the introduction of replacement pigs combined with whole-herd exposure to live PRRS virus (PRRSV)] has been widely used in North America and has shown wonderful outcomes in controlling PRRS in the field. In the present study, we performed analyses of the production performance of four herds acutely infected with PRRSV by adopting this measure for the first time in China. Our results showed that the development rate of gilts decreased by a mean of 8.56%, the farrowing rate of breeding sows decreased from 86.18 to 77.61%, the number of piglets born alive per sow decreased by a mean of 0.73 pigs, and the pre-weaning and post-weaning mortality of piglets increased by a mean of 2.74–4.97% compared to the parameters of 6 months before an outbreak. The time to PRRSV stability (TTS), defined as the time in weeks it took to produce PRRSV-negative pigs at weaning, is an important indicator of successful control of PRRSV. The median TTS among herds A, C, and D was 21.8 weeks (21.6 22.1 weeks). In herd B, TTS was 42.3 weeks, which could be explained by the double introduction of gilts. Our study suggests that the “load-close-exposure” strategy may be a good alternative for Chinese producers and veterinaries to control PRRS in the field.

[1]  Chunhong Zhang,et al.  Efficacy of the Synergy Between Live-Attenuated and Inactivated PRRSV Vaccines Against a NADC30-Like Strain of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in 4-Week Piglets , 2022, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[2]  G. Franzo,et al.  Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) Epidemiology in an Integrated Pig Company of Northern Italy: A Multilevel Threat Requiring Multilevel Interventions , 2021, Viruses.

[3]  C. Corzo,et al.  Emergence of a New Lineage 1C Variant of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 in the United States , 2021, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[4]  W. Cao,et al.  Biogas energy generated from livestock manure in China: Current situation and future trends. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  I. Szabó,et al.  PRRS eradication from swine farms in five regions of Hungary. , 2020, Acta veterinaria Hungarica.

[6]  J. Rushton,et al.  Modeling Economic Effects of Vaccination Against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome: Impact of Vaccination Effectiveness, Vaccine Price, and Vaccination Coverage , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[7]  HongLiang Zhang,et al.  Evolutionary and recombination analysis of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome isolates in China , 2020, Virus Genes.

[8]  I. Szabó,et al.  Eradication of PRRS from backyard swine herds in Hungary between 2012 and 2018. , 2019, Acta veterinaria Hungarica.

[9]  Jun Han,et al.  Evolutionary analysis of six isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus from a single pig farm: MLV-evolved and recombinant viruses. , 2018, Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases.

[10]  C. Nathues,et al.  Modelling the economic efficiency of using different strategies to control Porcine Reproductive & Respiratory Syndrome at herd level. , 2018, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[11]  R. Morrison,et al.  Monitoring breeding herd production data to detect PRRSV outbreaks. , 2017, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[12]  K. Schwartz,et al.  Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus reduces feed efficiency, digestibility, and lean tissue accretion in grow-finish pigs1 , 2017, Translational animal science.

[13]  J. Lunney,et al.  Alternative strategies for the control and elimination of PRRS. , 2017, Veterinary microbiology.

[14]  R. Morrison,et al.  Effect of immunologic solutions on sows and gilts on time to stability, and production losses in breeding herds infected with 1-7-4 PRRSv. , 2017, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[15]  Jun Han,et al.  Pathogenesis and control of the Chinese highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2017, Veterinary microbiology.

[16]  Shen Yang,et al.  Characterization of three porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates from a single swine farm bearing strong homology to a vaccine strain. , 2015, Veterinary microbiology.

[17]  R. Morrison,et al.  Comparison of time to PRRSv-stability and production losses between two exposure programs to control PRRSv in sow herds. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[18]  R. Morrison,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for the control and elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2012, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[19]  J. Kliebenstein,et al.  Economic Impact of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus on U.S. Pork Producers , 2012 .

[20]  Dale Polson,et al.  Terminology for classifying swine herds by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus status , 2011, Journal of Swine Health and Production.

[21]  Montserrat Torremorell,et al.  Control and elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. , 2010, Virus research.

[22]  M. McCaw Effect of reducing crossfostering at birth on piglet mortality and performance during an acute outbreak of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. , 2000 .