A common visual metric for approximate number and density

There is considerable interest in how humans estimate the number of objects in a scene in the context of an extensive literature on how we estimate the density (i.e., spacing) of objects. Here, we show that our sense of number and our sense of density are intertwined. Presented with two patches, observers found it more difficult to spot differences in either density or numerosity when those patches were mismatched in overall size, and their errors were consistent with larger patches appearing both denser and more numerous. We propose that density is estimated using the relative response of mechanisms tuned to low and high spatial frequencies (SFs), because energy at high SFs is largely determined by the number of objects, whereas low SF energy depends more on the area occupied by elements. This measure is biased by overall stimulus size in the same way as human observers, and by estimating number using the same measure scaled by relative stimulus size, we can explain all of our results. This model is a simple, biologically plausible common metric for perceptual number and density.

[1]  W. STANLEY JEVONS,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[2]  Responses of Disturbed Adolescents on the Kahn Test of Symbol Arrangement , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Effect of Item Arrangement on Perceived Numerosity: Randomness vs Regularity , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  T. Tuulmets,et al.  Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Allik,et al.  Size invariance in visual number discrimination , 1991, Psychological research.

[8]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[10]  R. Watt,et al.  The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture , 1997, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[13]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  J. Ross Visual Discrimination of Number without Counting , 2003, Perception.

[15]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Brannon,et al.  Monotonic Coding of Numerosity in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area , 2007, PLoS biology.

[17]  F. Durgin Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[18]  Stephen F. Goodwin,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism: Can You Smell the Difference? , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing Mechanism , 2008, PloS one.

[21]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.

[23]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  How Humans Count: Numerosity and the Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[24]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  D. Burr,et al.  Vision senses number directly. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[26]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  Wilson S Geisler,et al.  Region grouping in natural foliage scenes: image statistics and human performance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[28]  Midori Tokita,et al.  How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Effect of the luminance signal on adaptation-based time compression. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[31]  Philip Meier,et al.  Collinear features impair visual detection by rats. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[32]  M. Sahani,et al.  Observers Exploit Stochastic Models of Sensory Change to Help Judge the Passage of Time , 2011, Current Biology.

[33]  Marc S. Tibber,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a common metric underlying number and density discrimination , 2011 .

[34]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  Efficiencies for the statistics of size discrimination. , 2011, Journal of vision.