Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems

Recent trust research in the information systems (IS) field has described trust as a primary predictor of technology usage and a fundamental construct for understanding user perceptions of technology. Initial trust formation is particularly relevant in an IS context, as users must overcome perceptions of risk and uncertainty before using a novel technology. With initial trust in a more complex, organizational information system, there are a number of external determinants, trusting bases, that may explain trust formation and provide organizations with the needed levers to form or change individuals' initial trust in technology. In this study, a research model of initial trust formation is developed and includes trusting bases, trusting beliefs, trusting attitude and subjective norm, and trusting intentions. Eight trusting base factors are assessed including personality, cognitive, calculative, and both technology and organizational factors of the institutional base. The model is empirically tested with 443 subjects in the context of initial trust in a national identity system (NID). The proposed model was supported and the results indicate that subjective norm and the cognitive-reputation, calculative, and organizational situational normality base factors significantly influence initial trusting beliefs and other downstream trust constructs. Factors from some of the more commonly investigated bases, personality and technology institutional, did not significantly affect trusting beliefs. The findings have strategic implications for agencies implementing e-government systems and organizational information systems in general.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Role of System Trust in Business-to-Consumer Transactions , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  S. Shapiro.  The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships , 1998 .

[6]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Two sides to attitudinal commitment: The effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanisms in distribution channels , 2002 .

[7]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: does it really matter? , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Xin Li,et al.  Using attitude and social influence to develop an extended trust model for information systems , 2006, DATB.

[9]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Technology and Organizations , 1990 .

[10]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the World Wide Web , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[11]  Walter W. Powell.  Trust-Based Forms of Governance , 1996 .

[12]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Andrew J. I. Jones.  On the concept of trust , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  David Gefen,et al.  Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers , 2002, Data Base.

[15]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Business on a handshake , 1992 .

[16]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions , 1974 .

[17]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[18]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Reflections on an initial trust-building model , 2006 .

[19]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[23]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[24]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[25]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Marcel Creemers,et al.  Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Xueming Luo.  Trust production and privacy concerns on the Internet , 2002 .

[28]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[30]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[31]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[32]  J. Rotter.  A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[33]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Handbook of Trust Research , 2006 .

[34]  David Gefen,et al.  Assessing Unidimensionality Through LISREL: An Explanation and an Example , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  E. Erikson.  Identity, youth, and crisis , 1968 .

[36]  J. Rotter.  Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. , 1980 .

[37]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Consumer trust in an Internet store , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[38]  John Orbell,et al.  Trust, social categories, and individuals: The case of gender , 1994 .

[39]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[40]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[43]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  M. Deutsch.  Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[45]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  C. Johnson-George,et al.  Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. , 1982 .

[47]  Ke-Hai Yuan,et al.  On Averaging Variables in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model , 1997 .

[48]  David Gefen,et al.  Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[49]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[50]  H. R. Rao,et al.  A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: a conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives , 2005, Decision Support Systems.

[51]  David Gefen,et al.  What Makes an ERP Implementation Relationship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[53]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  What is Trust? A Conceptual Analysis and an Interdisciplinary Model , 2000 .

[54]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[55]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Scientific inquiry and the social sciences , 1981 .

[56]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[57]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[59]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[60]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Information Systems Research Challenge: Experimental Research Methods , 1990 .

[61]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. , 1995 .

[63]  P. Franses,et al.  The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: Does age of relationship matter? , 2002 .

[64]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[65]  Influence,et al.  Perspectives on social power , 1974 .

[66]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[67]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[68]  John W. Mullins,et al.  Situational strength – A framework for understanding the role of individuals in initiating proactive strategic change , 1999 .

[69]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[70]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[71]  R. K. Goldsen,et al.  Occupations and Values , 1980 .

[72]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational Environment , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[73]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The future of diffusion research , 2001, DATB.

[74]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[75]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  M. Brewer,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics , 1978 .

[77]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[78]  O. Williamson.  Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[79]  L. Wrightsman.  CHAPTER 8 – Interpersonal Trust and Attitudes toward Human Nature , 1991 .

[80]  D. Gefen,et al.  Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services , 2004 .

[81]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[82]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  P. Dasgupta.  Trust as a commodity , 1988 .

[84]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[85]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[86]  D. Collard,et al.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1989 .

[87]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[88]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[89]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[90]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Trustworthiness in B2C e-commerce: an examination of alternative models , 2005, DATB.

[91]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[92]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[93]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[94]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[95]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[97]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[98]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[99]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[100]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations , 1994 .

[101]  L. Zucker.  Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. , 1986 .

[102]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[103]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[104]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships, Academy of Management Review, , . , 1998 .

[105]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[106]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  The Use of Extrinsic Cues to Facilitate Product Adoption , 1982 .

[107]  A. Baier.  Trust and Antitrust , 1986, Ethics.