Improving gene expression analysis efficacy from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues.

INTRODUCTION Improving RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis techniques has emerged due to advancements in the knowledge of molecular basis of most diseases. This in turn increased the need of higher quantity and quality of the extracted genetic material to be used for a variety of diagnostic tests and experiments. AIM The aim of the study was to compare three modified methods for RNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) biopsied tissue and different cDNA synthesis strategies to facilitate study of gene expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS Compared RNA extraction methods were: lysis buffer, phenol-based extraction, and combination of both with concomitant use of silica-based spin columns. RNA quantity and purity were estimated spectrophotometrically. Different priming strategies for cDNA synthesis were applied: oligo dT, combination of oligo dT and random hexamer, and gene specific primer. Two-step RT-qPCR of ribosomal protein L37A on preamplified and non-preamplified cDNA templates was performed. RESULTS The combination of lysis buffer with phenol based extraction gave higher RNA yield. By doing cDNA preamplification, the confidence of detection by qPCR was raised, and efficiency was improved. The preamplified template increased the sensitivity of analysis. CONCLUSIONS Together, the combination of approaches improved substantially the reproducibility and validity of quantitative gene expression analyses from FFPE tissues.

[1]  T. Godfrey,et al.  Properties of targeted preamplification in DNA and cDNA quantification , 2015, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[2]  Lloyd M. Smith,et al.  Measuring the Formaldehyde Protein–DNA Cross-Link Reversal Rate , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  J. Lötvall,et al.  Importance of RNA isolation methods for analysis of exosomal RNA: evaluation of different methods. , 2012, Molecular immunology.

[4]  G. Turashvili,et al.  Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques. , 2012, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[5]  T. O'Leary,et al.  The effect of formaldehyde fixation on RNA: optimization of formaldehyde adduct removal. , 2011, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[6]  A. Ballestrero,et al.  Reliability and Reproducibility of a RNA Preamplification Method for Low-density Array Analysis From Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Breast Cancer Samples , 2009, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[7]  S. Libutti,et al.  Factors in Tissue Handling and Processing That Impact RNA Obtained From Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissue , 2008, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[8]  Silke von Ahlfen,et al.  Determinants of RNA Quality from FFPE Samples , 2007, PloS one.

[9]  S. Hewitt,et al.  Optimization of Recovery of RNA From Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Tissue , 2006, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[10]  A. Gruber,et al.  Impact of formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding on the ratio between mRNA copy numbers of differently expressed genes , 2005, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[11]  S. Hamilton-Dutoit,et al.  Towards quantitative mRNA analysis in paraffin-embedded tissues using real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction: a methodological study on lymph nodes from melanoma patients. , 2003, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[12]  K. Hillan,et al.  Unlocking the archive – gene expression in paraffin‐embedded tissue , 2001, The Journal of pathology.

[13]  M. Monden,et al.  Analysis of chemical modification of RNA from formalin-fixed samples and optimization of molecular biology applications for such samples. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.