On the steady-state behavior of low-inertia power systems

Abstract Whereas conventional power systems heavily rely on bulk generation by synchronous machines, future power systems will be comprised of distributed generation based on renewable sources interfaced by power electronics. A direct consequence of retiring synchronous generators is the loss of rotational inertia, which thus far was the dominant time constant in a power system, as well as the loss of the generator controls, which are the main source of actuation of the power grid. Prompted by these paradigm shifts, we study the dynamic behavior of a nonlinear and first-principle low-inertia power system model including detailed power converter models and their interactions with the power grid. In this paper, we focus particularly on the admissible steady-state behavior of such a low-inertia power grid and derive necessary and sufficient control specifications for power converters.

[1]  R. Iravani,et al.  Multivariable Dynamic Model and Robust Control of a Voltage-Source Converter for Power System Applications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Mohit Sinha,et al.  Uncovering Droop Control Laws Embedded Within the Nonlinear Dynamics of Van der Pol Oscillators , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[3]  George Weiss,et al.  A warning about the use of reduced models of synchronous generators , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on the Science of Electrical Engineering (ICSEE).

[4]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Uses and abuses of the swing equation model , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[5]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Compositional Transient Stability Analysis of Multimachine Power Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[6]  Wilhelm Winter,et al.  Pushing the Limits: Europe's New Grid: Innovative Tools to Combat Transmission Bottlenecks and Reduced Inertia , 2015, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[7]  Florian Dorfler,et al.  Grid-Friendly Matching of Synchronous Machines by Tapping into the DC Storage* , 2016 .

[8]  Jon Are Suul,et al.  Virtual synchronous machines — Classification of implementations and analysis of equivalence to droop controllers for microgrids , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.

[9]  Pieter Tielens,et al.  The relevance of inertia in power systems , 2016 .

[10]  Dominic Groß,et al.  On the steady-state behavior of a nonlinear power network model , 2016 .

[11]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  Breaking the Hierarchy: Distributed Control and Economic Optimality in Microgrids , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[12]  Qing-Chang Zhong,et al.  Synchronverters: Inverters That Mimic Synchronous Generators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Dominic Gross,et al.  On the steady-state behavior of a nonlinear power system model , 2016, Autom..

[14]  Peter W. Sauer,et al.  Power System Dynamics and Stability , 1997 .

[15]  Jacquelien M. A. Scherpen,et al.  A port-Hamiltonian approach to power network modeling and analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Control.