Two-stage game theoretical framework for IaaS market share dynamics

Abstract In this paper, we consider the problem of cloud market share among Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers in a competitive setting. The public cloud market is dominated by few large providers, which prevents a healthy competition that would benefit the end-users. We argue that to make the cloud market more competitive, new providers, even small ones, should be able to inter this market and find a share. This problem of deeply analyzing the cloud market and providing new players with mechanisms allowing them to have a market share has not been addressed yet. In fact, to make the cloud market open and increase the cloud service demand, we show in this paper that the cloud providers have to compete not only over price, but also quality. Most of the research performed in the cloud market competition focus only on pricing mechanisms, neglecting thus the cloud service quality and user’s satisfaction. However, to be consistent with the new era of cloud computing, Cloud 2.0, providers have to focus on providing value to businesses and offer higher quality services. As a solution to the aforementioned problem, we propose a conceptual, user-centric game theoretical framework that includes a two-stage game: 1) to capture the user demand preferences (optimal capacity and price), a Stackelberg game is used where IaaS providers are leaders and IaaS users are followers; and 2) to enhance the service ratings given by users in order to improve the provider position in the market and increase the future users’ demand, a differential game is proposed, which allows IaaS providers to compete over service quality (e.g., QoS, scalability and adding extra features). The proposed two-stage game model allows the new IaaS providers, even if they are small, to have a share in the market and increase user’s satisfaction through providing high quality and added-value services. To validate the theoretical analysis, experimental results are conducted using a real-world cloud service quality feedback, collected by the CloudArmor project. This research reveals that due to the fact that service customization tends to enhance the customers loyalty in today’s subscription cloud economy, the best strategy for small IaaS providers is to increase the service cost and improve the quality of their added-value solutions to prevent customers’ defection. This not only elevates the provider’s profit, but also increases the quality equilibrium that leads to a higher user satisfaction. Consequently, higher satisfaction enhances the provider’s rating and future users demand.

[1]  G. Gutierrez,et al.  Life-Cycle Channel Coordination Issues in Launching an Innovative Durable Product , 2010 .

[2]  Lina Yao,et al.  CloudArmor: Supporting Reputation-Based Trust Management for Cloud Services , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[3]  Mark Burgess,et al.  On the stability of adaptive Service Level Agreements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[4]  Dag I. K. Sjøberg,et al.  Confronting the myth of rapid obsolescence in computing research , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Victor Chang,et al.  Security modeling and efficient computation offloading for service workflow in mobile edge computing , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[6]  Muthu Ramachandran,et al.  Cloud Computing Adoption Framework – a security framework for business clouds , 2015 .

[7]  Tao Qin,et al.  Optimal Pricing for the Competitive and Evolutionary Cloud Market , 2015, IJCAI.

[8]  L. M. Hocking Optimal control : an introduction to the theory with applications , 1991 .

[9]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Provisioning of ad-supported cloud services: The role of competition , 2018, Perform. Evaluation.

[10]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Bin Gu,et al.  Do online reviews matter? - An empirical investigation of panel data , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Laiping Zhao,et al.  Online Virtual Machine Placement for Increasing Cloud Provider’s Revenue , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[13]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Online learning offloading framework for heterogeneous mobile edge computing system , 2019, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[14]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  The Business Perspective on Cloud Computing - A Literature Review of Research on Cloud Computing , 2012, AMCIS.

[15]  Dave Durkee,et al.  Why cloud computing will never be free , 2010, ACM Queue.

[16]  Djamal Zeghlache,et al.  Constrained Pricing for Cloud Resource Allocation , 2011, 2011 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications.

[17]  Will Venters,et al.  Moving to the Cloud Corporation - How to face the challenges and harness the potential of cloud computing , 2013 .

[18]  Sherif Sakr,et al.  On understanding the economics and elasticity challenges of deploying business applications on public cloud infrastructure , 2012, Journal of Internet Services and Applications.

[19]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Low-latency orchestration for workflow-oriented service function chain in edge computing , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[20]  Honggang Wang,et al.  Stackelberg Game for Bandwidth Allocation in Cloud-Based Wireless Live-Streaming Social Networks , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[21]  Ali Movaghar-Rahimabadi,et al.  Efficient distribution of requests in federated cloud computing environments utilizing statistical multiplexing , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[22]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A dynamic model for optimal design quality and return policies , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Subhas C. Misra,et al.  Identification of a company's suitability for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its corresponding Return on Investment , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[24]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Competition on Price and Quality in Cloud Computing , 2016, WWW.

[25]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-of-things environments , 2018, Comput. Secur..

[26]  S. Sethi,et al.  A survey of Stackelberg differential game models in supply and marketing channels , 2007 .

[27]  Keqin Li,et al.  Envy-free auction mechanism for VM pricing and allocation in clouds , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[28]  Jamal Bentahar,et al.  Towards Trustworthy Multi-Cloud Services Communities: A Trust-Based Hedonic Coalitional Game , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[29]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[30]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Profit and Customer Satisfaction for Service Provisioning in the Cloud , 2011, HPDC '11.

[31]  Jamal Bentahar,et al.  New Insights Towards Developing Recommender Systems , 2018, Comput. J..

[32]  Qi Yu CloudRec: a framework for personalized service Recommendation in the Cloud , 2013, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[33]  L. Samuelson Game Theory in Economics and Beyond , 2016 .

[34]  Wen Ji,et al.  Profit optimization in service-oriented data market: A Stackelberg game approach , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[35]  Pan Hui,et al.  Economic models for cloud service markets: Pricing and Capacity planning , 2013, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[36]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  A Note on Feedback Sequential Equilibria in a Lanchester Model with Empirical Application , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[37]  A. Goldberger The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions , 1968 .

[38]  Hamzeh Khazaei,et al.  Performance modeling of cloud computing centers , 2013 .

[39]  Philippe Thiran,et al.  Analyzing Communities of Web Services Using Incentives , 2010, Int. J. Web Serv. Res..

[40]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  Towards provisioning hybrid virtual networks in federated cloud data centers , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[41]  Jamal Bentahar,et al.  A Stackelberg game for distributed formation of business-driven services communities , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Azer Bestavros,et al.  Toward an Open Cloud Marketplace: Vision and First Steps , 2014, IEEE Internet Computing.

[43]  Roger Smith,et al.  Computing in the Cloud , 2009 .

[44]  Xuejie Zhang,et al.  An online auction mechanism for cloud computing resource allocation and pricing based on user evaluation and cost , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[45]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Community-Based Recommender Systems: Analyzing Business Models from a Systems Operator's Perspective , 2009 .

[46]  Jamal Bentahar,et al.  On the Effects of User Ratings on the Profitability of Cloud Services , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS).