How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation

Laursen and Salter (2006) examined the impact of a firm's search strategy for external knowledge on innovative performance. Based on organizational learning and open innovation literature, we extend the model hypothesizing that the search strategy itself is impacted by firm context. That is, both ‘constraints on the application of firm resources’ and the ‘abundance of external knowledge’ have a direct impact on innovative performance and a firm's search strategy in terms of breadth and depth. Based on a survey of Swiss-based firms, we find that constraints decrease and external knowledge increases innovative performance. Although constraints lead to a broader but shallower search, external knowledge is associated with the breadth and the depth of the search in a U-shaped relationship. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Calantone,et al.  Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison , 1996 .

[2]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[3]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[4]  Kuang-Peng Hung,et al.  Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows , 2010 .

[5]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[6]  W. Shan.  An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms , 1990 .

[7]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[8]  P. Roberts.  Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[9]  L. Bourgeois.  On the Measurement of Organizational Slack , 1981 .

[10]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[11]  Ana Paula Faria,et al.  Innovation across Europe: how important are institutional differences? , 2011 .

[12]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[13]  Parimal Patel,et al.  The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies , 1994 .

[14]  Linda Argote,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm - 40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Bettina Peters,et al.  Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries , 2006 .

[16]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[17]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[19]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[20]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[21]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[23]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: towards a push model of open innovation , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[24]  W. Sofka,et al.  Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries , 2009 .

[25]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[26]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[27]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development , 1996 .

[28]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[29]  M. Sawhney,et al.  Communities of Creation: Managing Distributed Innovation in Turbulent Markets , 2000 .

[30]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity , 2007 .

[32]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[33]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Strategies for Technological Innovation with Learning and Adaptation Costs , 2005 .

[36]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[37]  R. Gulati.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[38]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[39]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[40]  M. Ferru.  Formation Process and Geography of Science–Industry Partnerships: The Case of the University of Poitiers , 2010 .

[41]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The role of codified sources of knowledge in innovation: Empirical evidence from Dutch manufacturing , 2005 .

[42]  John K. Christiansen,et al.  Formal Rules in Product Development: Sensemaking of Structured Approaches* , 2009 .

[43]  H. Volberda,et al.  Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence , 2004 .

[44]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems , 2001 .

[46]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[47]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[48]  Todd E. Clark.  Employment Fluctuations in U.S. Regions and Industries: The Roles of National, Region‐Specific, and Industry‐Specific Shocks , 1998, Journal of Labor Economics.

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[50]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[51]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation , 2001 .

[52]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .