Evaluation of Strategies to Improve Uptake of Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis Treatment in Minnesota: A Decision Analytic Model

Background. Despite the established effectiveness of expedited partner therapy (EPT) in partner treatment of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI), the practice is underutilized. Objective. To estimate the relative effectiveness of strategies to increase EPT uptake (numbers of partners treated for chlamydia). Methods. We developed a care cascade model of cumulative probabilities to estimate the number of partners treated under strategies to increase EPT uptake in Minnesota. The care cascade model used data from clinical trials, population-based studies, and Minnesota chlamydia surveillance as well as in-depth interviews of health providers who regularly treat STI patients and a statewide survey of health providers across Minnesota. Results. Several strategies could improve EPT uptake among providers, including facilitating treatment payment (additional 1,932 partners treated) and implementing electronic health record reminders (additional 1,755 partners treated). Addressing concerns about liability would have the greatest effect, resulting in 2,187 additional partners treated. Conclusions. Providers expressed openness to offering EPT under several scenarios, which reflect differences in knowledge about EPT, its legality, and potential risks to patients. While addressing concerns about provider liability would have the greatest effect on number of partners treated, provider education and procedural changes could make a substantial impact. Highlights Addressing provider concerns about expedited partner therapy (EPT) legality and its potential risks would result in the most partners treated for chlamydia. EPT alerts and electronic EPT prescriptions may also streamline partner treatment. Provider education about the legality of EPT and its potential risks and training in counseling patients on EPT could also increase uptake.

[1]  S. Lofgren,et al.  A Statewide Mixed-Methods Study of Provider Knowledge and Behavior Administering Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea , 2022, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[2]  I. Spicknall,et al.  Sexually Transmitted Infections Among US Women and Men: Prevalence and Incidence Estimates, 2018. , 2021, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[3]  J. Schillinger,et al.  Do Prescriptions for Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia Get Filled? Findings From a Multi-Jurisdictional Evaluation, United States, 2017–2019 , 2020, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[4]  R. Stephenson,et al.  Healthcare providers and community perspectives on expedited partner therapy (EPT) for use with gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men , 2019, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[5]  Michelle L. Pickett,et al.  Insights from pharmacists and pharmacy technicians about expedited partner therapy. , 2019, Sexual health.

[6]  Sabrina Opiola McCauley,et al.  Expedited Partner Therapy: A Review for the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner. , 2017, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[7]  A. Bonny,et al.  A Review of Expedited Partner Therapy for the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Adolescents. , 2017, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[8]  K. Holmes,et al.  Uptake and Population-Level Impact of Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: The Washington State Community-Level Randomized Trial of EPT , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[9]  J. Schillinger,et al.  Predictors of Index Patient Acceptance of Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection and Reasons for Refusal, Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics, New York City, 2011 to 2012 , 2014, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  N. Low,et al.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[11]  R. Santucci,et al.  Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Management by Urology, Emergency Medicine and Obstetrician/Gynecology Physicians does not Generally Follow CDC Guidelines , 2013 .

[12]  Jill S. Huppert,et al.  Expedited partner therapy for adolescents diagnosed with chlamydia or gonorrhea: a position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[13]  D. Brewer,et al.  Evaluation of a Population-Based Program of Expedited Partner Therapy for Gonorrhea and Chlamydial Infection , 2007, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[14]  G. Pugliese,et al.  Severe Streptococcus pyogenes Infections, United Kingdom, 2003–2004 , 2008, Emerging infectious diseases.