Rational design, synthesis, and verification of affinity ligands to a protein surface cleft

The structure‐based design, synthesis, and screening of a glucuronic acid scaffold library of affinity ligands directed toward the catalytic cleft on porcine pancreas α‐amylase are presented. The design was based on the simulated docking to the enzyme active site of 53 aryl glycosides from the Available Chemicals Directory (ACD) selected by in silico screening. Twenty‐three compounds were selected for synthesis and screened in solution for binding toward α‐amylase using nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. The designed molecules include a handle outside of the binding site to allow their attachment to various surfaces with minimal loss of binding activity. After initial screening in solution, one affinity ligand was selected, immobilized to Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences), and evaluated as a chromatographic probe. A column packed with ligand‐coupled Sepharose specifically retained the enzyme, which could be eluted by a known inhibitor.

[1]  A. Ortiz,et al.  Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  C. Lowe,et al.  New strategy for the design of ligands for the purification of pharmaceutical proteins by affinity chromatography. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[3]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Characterization of Ligand Binding by Saturation Transfer Difference NMR Spectroscopy. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  C. Lowe,et al.  Design, synthesis, and application of a Protein A mimetic , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  S. Spinelli,et al.  Structure of a pancreatic α‐amylase bound to a substrate analogue at 2.03 Å resolution , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Huber,et al.  Carbohydrate and protein-based inhibitors of porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase: structure analysis and comparison of their binding characteristics. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. , 1995, Structure.

[10]  J. Peng,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance-based approaches for lead generation in drug discovery. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  M. Wilchek,et al.  An overview of affinity chromatography. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  J. S. Dixon Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section , 1997, Proteins.

[13]  G. Speijers,et al.  Analytical, toxicological and immunological consequences of the use of N-ethyl-N'-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide as coupling reagent for the preparation of meningococcal group C polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate as vaccine for human use. , 1986, Developments in biological standardization.

[14]  C. R. Lowe Protein purification: Principles and practice , 1984 .