Enterobacteriaceae and related organisms isolated from shell eggs collected during commercial processing.

In the United States, commercial shell eggs are washed and graded before retail. Since passage of the Egg Products Inspection Act in 1971, processing guidelines have been set to ensure that external and internal characteristics are maintained. However, less is known about how commercial processing affects the safety of shell eggs. To identify enteric bacteria entering plants and persisting throughout processing, eggs were collected from 3 US commercial shell egg-processing plants on 3 separate visits. On each plant visit, 12 eggs were collected from each of 12 sites along the processing line: accumulator, prewash rinse, first washer, second washer, sanitizer rinse, dryer, oiler, check detection/scales, 2 egg grader/packer head lanes, rewash belt entrance, and rewash belt exit. Each egg was sampled by a rinse technique, and the rinsate was plated onto violet red bile glucose agar with overlay for the detection and enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae. From each plate, up to 5 colonies were randomly selected and isolated for identification to genus or species by using biochemical tests. Several genera and species were detected at each of the 3 plants. Sites from which the greatest numbers of isolates were identified were those collected from eggs during preprocessing (accumulator, prewash rinse) or from eggs judged as dirty (rewash belt entrance or exit). Sites yielding the smallest number of isolates were those during or at the end of processing. Escherichia coli and Enterobacter spp. were isolated from each of the 9 plant visits. Other genera isolated from at least 1 of the 3 plants included Cedecea, Citrobacter, Erwinia, Hafnia, Klebsiella, Kluyvera, Leclercia, Morganella, Proteus, Providencia, Rahnella, Salmonella, and Serratia. Non-Enterobacteriaceae isolated and identified included Aeromonas, Chryseomonas, Listonella, Pseudomonas, Sphingobacterium, Vibrio, and Xanthomonas. All of the genera and species were recovered less frequently from fully processed eggs than from unwashed eggs, indicating that shell eggs are less contaminated with bacteria as a result of commercial washing procedures.

[1]  S. Ladely,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolated from commercial shell eggs. , 2006, Poultry science.

[2]  Hristo Daskalov,et al.  The importance of Aeromonas hydrophila in food safety , 2006 .

[3]  T. L. Lindsay,et al.  Group #4 , 2006 .

[4]  J. Northcutt,et al.  Recovery of Salmonella from commercial shell eggs by shell rinse and shell crush methodologies. , 2005, Poultry science.

[5]  Deana R. Jones,et al.  Impact of commercial processing on the microbiology of shell eggs. , 2005, Journal of food protection.

[6]  Deana R. Jones,et al.  Chemical analyses of commercial shell egg wash water , 2005 .

[7]  J. Northcutt,et al.  Variations in external and internal microbial populations in shell eggs during extended storage. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[8]  Deana R. Jones,et al.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae from washed and unwashed commercial shell eggs. , 2004, Journal of food protection.

[9]  M. W. Reij,et al.  Occurrence of Enterobacter sakazakii in food production environments and households , 2004, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Lehane,et al.  Isolation of Enterobacter sakazakii from Midgut of Stomoxys calcitrans , 2003, Emerging infectious diseases.

[11]  A. Moore,et al.  Washing table eggs: a review of the scientific and engineering issues , 2003 .

[12]  R H Davies,et al.  Investigation of Salmonella contamination and disinfection in farm egg-packing plants. , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[13]  M. Drake,et al.  Aeromonas species in foods. , 2002, Journal of food protection.

[14]  G. Zeidler.  Processing and Packaging Shell Eggs , 2002 .

[15]  J. Johnson,et al.  Enterobacteriaceae, Coliforms, and Escherichia coli as Quality and Safety Indicators , 2001 .

[16]  R. C. Baker,et al.  Effects of processing on the microbiology of eggs , 1994 .

[17]  J. Holt.  Group 4 gram-negative aerobic/microaerophilic rods and cocci , 1994 .

[18]  H L Muytjens,et al.  Quality of powdered substitutes for breast milk with regard to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae , 1988, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[19]  R. Colwell,et al.  Phylogeny of the Vibrionaceae, and recommendation for two new genera, Listonella and Shewanella , 1985 .

[20]  S E Millership,et al.  Methods for the isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila and Plesiomonas shigelloides from faeces , 1984, Journal of Hygiene.

[21]  W. A. Moats,et al.  Effect of Temperature, pH, and Detergent on Survival of Bacteria Associated with Shell Eggs , 1981 .

[22]  W. A. Moats.  Classification of bacteria from commercial egg washers and washed and unwashed eggs , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[23]  A. Mercuri,et al.  Coliforms and Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from Selected Foods. , 1979, Journal of food protection.

[24]  W. A. Moats.  Egg Washing -A Review. , 1978, Journal of food protection.

[25]  F. L. Hart,et al.  Eggs and Egg Products , 1971 .

[26]  C. Day,et al.  Microbiological Contamination of Water Used for Washing Eggs , 1970 .

[27]  R. Board.  The Course of Microbial Infection of the Hen's Egg , 1966 .

[28]  R. Board.  Review article: the course of microbial infection of the hen's egg. , 1966, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[29]  R. Forsythe,et al.  The Microbiological Contamination of Egg Shells and Egg Packing Materials , 1964 .

[30]  R. B. Haines.  Observations on the bacterial flora of the hen's egg, with a description of new species of Proteus and Pseudomonas causing rots in eggs , 1938, Journal of Hygiene.