Molecular Breeding for Complex Adaptive Traits: How Integrating Crop Ecophysiology and Modelling Can Enhance Efficiency

Progress in crop improvement is limited by the ability to identify favourable combinations of genotypes (G) and management practices (M) in relevant target environments (E) given the resources available to search among the myriad of possible combinations. To underpin yield advance we require prediction of phenotype based on genotype. In plant breeding, traditional phenotypic selection methods have involved measuring phenotypic performance of large segregating populations in multi-environment trials and applying rigorous statistical procedures based on quantitative genetic theory to identify superior individuals. Recent developments in the ability to inexpensively and densely map/sequence genomes have facilitated a shift from the level of the individual (genotype) to the level of the genomic region. Molecular breeding strategies using genome wide prediction and genomic selection approaches have developed rapidly. However, their applicability to complex traits remains constrained by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, which restrict the predictive power of associations of genomic regions with phenotypic responses. Here it is argued that crop ecophysiology and functional whole plant modelling can provide an effective link between molecular and organism scales and enhance molecular breeding by adding value to genetic prediction approaches. A physiological framework that facilitates dissection and modelling of complex traits can inform phenotyping methods for marker/gene detection and underpin prediction of likely phenotypic consequences of trait and genetic variation in target environments. This approach holds considerable promise for more effectively linking genotype to phenotype for complex adaptive traits. Specific examples focused on drought adaptation are presented to highlight the concepts.

[1]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[2]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Simulation Supplements Field Studies to Determine No-Till Dryland Corn Population Recommendations for Semiarid Western Nebraska , 2013 .

[3]  J. Kirkegaard,et al.  Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield , 2007 .

[4]  Vegetative growth and soil water extraction of two maize hybrids during water deficits , 1997 .

[5]  G. Hammer,et al.  Does Increased Leaf Appearance Rate Enhance Adaptation to Postanthesis Drought Stress in Sorghum , 2011 .

[6]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modelling environmental effects on phenology and canopy development of diverse sorghum genotypes. , 2009 .

[7]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Transpiration Response of Maize Hybrids to Atmospheric Vapour Pressure Deficit , 2013 .

[8]  G. Hammer,et al.  Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. , 2005, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[9]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement , 2002 .

[10]  G. Hammer Pathways to prosperity: breaking the yield barrier in sorghum , 2006 .

[11]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Temperature effect on transpiration response of maize plants to vapour pressure deficit , 2012 .

[12]  M. Morell,et al.  A Parameterized Model of Amylopectin Synthesis Provides Key Insights into the Synthesis of Granular Starch , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  F. Tardieu Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[14]  Greg McLean,et al.  Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[15]  G. Hammer,et al.  Morphological and architectural development of root systems in sorghum and maize , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[16]  QTL analysis in multiple sorghum populations facilitates the dissection of the genetic and physiological control of tillering , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[17]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .

[18]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean cultivars , 2009 .

[19]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  The GP problem: Quantifying gene-to-phenotype relationships , 2002, Silico Biol..

[20]  G. Hammer,et al.  Regulation of tillering in sorghum: genotypic effects. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[21]  C. Messina,et al.  Yield-trait performance landscapes: from theory to application in breeding maize for drought tolerance. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[22]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut , 1994 .

[23]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.

[24]  G. Hammer,et al.  Genetic variability and control of nodal root angle in sorghum , 2011 .

[25]  Greg McLean,et al.  Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  Peter deVoil,et al.  The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. , 2006, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[27]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Modelling genotypic and environmental control of leaf area dynamics in grain sorghum. I. Whole plant level , 1993 .

[28]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. , 2004, Trends in plant science.

[29]  Andrew J. Millar,et al.  Prediction of Photoperiodic Regulators from Quantitative Gene Circuit Models , 2009, Cell.

[30]  Carlos D. Messina,et al.  Hydraulic conductance of maize hybrids differing in transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit , 2014 .

[31]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems , 2005 .

[32]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered ‘slow-wilting’ and commercial soybean , 2007 .

[33]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Applying modelling experiences from the past to shape crop systems biology: the need to converge crop physiology and functional genomics. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[34]  D. Jordan,et al.  Supermodels: sorghum and maize provide mutual insight into the genetics of flowering time , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[35]  G. Hammer,et al.  A physiological framework to explain genetic and environmental regulation of tillering in sorghum. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[36]  P. Benfey,et al.  From Genotype to Phenotype: Systems Biology Meets Natural Variation , 2008, Science.

[37]  C. Messina,et al.  Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product. , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[38]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among sorghum genotypes , 2010 .

[39]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Genetic control of nodal root angle in sorghum and its implications on water extraction , 2012 .

[40]  Andrew P. Beatty,et al.  Assessment across the United States of the Benefits of Altered Soybean Drought Traits , 2010 .

[41]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[42]  Dean Podlich,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[43]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding. , 2009, Current opinion in plant biology.

[44]  Walid Sadok,et al.  Linking physiological and genetic analyses of the control of leaf growth under changing environmental conditions , 2005 .

[45]  C. T. Hash,et al.  Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[47]  L. Totir,et al.  Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[48]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) genotypes selected from a recombinant inbred line population , 2009 .

[49]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Gene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics , 2005 .

[50]  Barbara George-Jaeggli,et al.  Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[51]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia , 2005 .

[52]  C. Messina,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Floral Transition of the Shoot Apex in Maize and Its Dynamic Modeling , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  G. Hammer,et al.  QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[54]  G. Hammer,et al.  Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[55]  V. Vadez,et al.  Terminal drought-tolerant pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] have high leaf ABA and limit transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[56]  Edward S. Buckler,et al.  Crop genomics: advances and applications , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[57]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Genotypic variation in peanut for transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit , 2010 .

[58]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Can exploiting natural genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis contribute to increasing rice productivity? A simulation analysis. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.

[59]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Modelling Crop Improvement in a G×E×M Framework via Gene–Trait–Phenotype Relationships , 2009 .

[60]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[61]  M. Sorrells,et al.  Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement , 2009 .

[62]  Hydraulic conductance differences among sorghum genotypes to explain variation in restricted transpiration rates. , 2014, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[63]  B. Walsh,et al.  Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. , 2006, Trends in plant science.