Evaluation of electrostatic descriptors for predicting crystalline density

This study evaluates the importance of electrostatic corrections to earlier quantum‐mechanically based methods to predict crystal densities of neutral and ionic molecular energetic materials. Our previous methods (B. M. Rice et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 10874) use the molecular volumes of the isolated molecule or formula unit to estimate the crystal density; this volume is defined to be that inside the quantum‐mechanically determined 0.001 a.u. isosurface of electron density surrounding the isolated molecule. The electrostatic corrections to these volumetric estimates are based on features of the electrostatic potential mapped onto this isosurface of electron density, and have been parameterized using information from 180 neutral and 23 ionic CHNO molecular systems. The quality of the electrostatically corrected methods was assessed through application to 38 neutral and 48 ionic compounds not used in the parameterization. The root mean square (rms) percent deviation and average absolute error of predictions for the 38 neutral species relative to experiment are 2.7% and 0.035 g/cm3, respectively, decreases of 0.9% and 0.015 g/cm3 from the earlier predictions (3.6% and 0.050 g/cm3, respectively). The rms percent deviation and average absolute error of predictions for the 48 ionic compounds relative to experiment are 3.7% and 0.045 g/cm3, respectively, decreases of 2.6% and 0.043 g/cm3 from the earlier predictions that used the formula unit volumes only. The results clearly show a significant improvement to the earlier method upon inclusion of electrostatic corrections. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A. Becke.  Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange , 1993 .

[2]  Parr,et al.  Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  L. Glasser,et al.  Lattice potential energy estimation for complex ionic salts from density measurements. , 2002, Inorganic chemistry.

[4]  B. Rice,et al.  Accurate predictions of crystal densities using quantum mechanical molecular volumes. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[5]  Monica C. Concha,et al.  An electrostatic interaction correction for improved crystal density prediction , 2009 .

[6]  F. Allen.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[7]  B. Rice,et al.  A comparison of methods to predict solid phase heats of formation of molecular energetic salts. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[8]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Volume-based thermodynamics: estimations for 2:2 salts. , 2006, Inorganic chemistry.

[9]  Leslie Glasser,et al.  Relationships among Ionic Lattice Energies, Molecular (Formula Unit) Volumes, and Thermochemical Radii. , 1999, Inorganic chemistry.

[10]  J. Murray,et al.  Statistical analysis of the molecular surface electrostatic potential: an approach to describing noncovalent interactions in condensed phases , 1998 .

[11]  Peter Politzer,et al.  An electrostatic correction for improved crystal density predictions of energetic ionic compounds , 2010 .

[12]  Chang Kon Kim,et al.  Prediction of densities for solid energetic molecules with molecular surface electrostatic potentials , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  David A Dixon,et al.  Accurate thermochemical properties for energetic materials applications. II. Heats of formation of imidazolium-, 1,2,4-triazolium-, and tetrazolium-based energetic salts from isodesmic and lattice energy calculations. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.