Group Support Systems, Power, and Influence in an Organization: A Field Study

Emerging group technologies are attracting attention from researchers and practitioners for the benefits they potentially offer in terms of communications, productivity, and decision-making capabilities within an organization. To date, research in this area has focused on process or outcome variables, substantively ignoring organizational context issues. This paper reports on a field study that investigated users' perceptions of the impact of group support systems on power and influence within the organization. The study was conducted within a division of a major U.S. software company specializing in the development of business software tools for desktop PCs. Fifteen purposively selected managers and nonmanagers, spanning diverse functional areas, were extensively interviewed for this study. Evidence gathered suggested that group support systems are perceived to exert an equalizing force on power and influence by (1) increasing participation in the decision-making process, (2) improving access to information, (3) improving access to persons, (4) reducing the “power distance” to key individuals, and (5) providing increased opportunities to influence the opinions of others. These results provide a basis for future studies that will attempt to clarify the relationships between organizational context and group technology usage.

[1]  Paul Gray,et al.  Assessing GDSS empirical research , 1990 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[3]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation , 1978, MIS Q..

[4]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[5]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[7]  C. Saunders,et al.  Organizational power and the information services department: a reexamination , 1986, CACM.

[8]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[9]  H. Landsberger.  The Horizontal Dimension in Bureaucracy , 1961 .

[10]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[11]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[13]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power , 1977 .

[14]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[16]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[17]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[18]  G. Hofstede.  Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[19]  David Mechanic,et al.  Sources of Power of Lower Participants in Complex Organizations , 1962 .

[20]  Robert Dubin,et al.  Power, Function, and Organization , 1963 .

[21]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Advanced technology and the quality of working life: The effects of computerized controls on biscuit‐making operators , 1983 .

[22]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[23]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  J. Pennings,et al.  Structural conditions of intraorganizational power , 1974 .

[27]  Debra L. Nelson,et al.  Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review , 1990, MIS Q..

[28]  J. Pennings,et al.  A Strategic Contingencies' Theory of Intraorganizational Power , 1971 .

[29]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  The effects of electronic meetings on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research , 1990 .

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Utilizing GDSS technology: Final report on a recent empirical study , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[31]  M. Vold,et al.  New technology in the office: Attitudes and consequences , 1987 .