How Children Come to Understand Sustainable Development: A Contribution to Educational Agenda

This study provides an interdisciplinary account determining how children and adolescents understand urban and architectural aspects of sustainable development. The concept of sustainability implies complex relations between ethical, economical, social, technical and other qualities of our environment. The concept is difficult to understand for children who lack the abilities of abstract reasoning and multi-dimensional thinking. A new measure of sustainability understanding was formed based on pictorial rather than textual format and was applied to a large sample of over 2000 participants aged 6–19 years. The results indicated that girls had higher levels of appreciation toward sustainability issues than boys. The results also showed that understanding of sustainability issues increased progressively with age, particularly with adolescents from urban environments. The findings are discussed in terms of cognitive changes in adolescence and their implications for educational policy. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  P. Schultz,et al.  Sustainable Development as a Challenge for Psychology , 2002 .

[2]  A. Pawłowski.  How many dimensions does sustainable development have , 2008 .

[3]  Psychologists' roles in achieving a sustainable future. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[4]  B. B. Brown,et al.  The importance of peer group ("crowd") affiliation in adolescence. , 1986, Journal of adolescence.

[5]  T. Alabaster,et al.  Information for environmental citizenship , 1999 .

[6]  C. Vlek,et al.  Psychologists can do much to support sustainable development , 2003 .

[7]  Gary R. Lee,et al.  Rural‐Urban Differences Among the Elderly: Economic, Social, and Subjective Factors , 1980 .

[8]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. , 2010 .

[9]  R. Koestner,et al.  Adolescents' Motivation Toward the Environment: Age-Related Trends and Correlates , 2010 .

[10]  M. Caltabiano,et al.  Urban-rural differences in adolescent self-esteem, leisure boredom, and sensation-seeking as predictors of leisure-time usage and satisfaction. , 1996, Adolescence.

[11]  R C Brownson,et al.  Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States , 2000, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[12]  P. V. Geert,et al.  A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond , 1998 .

[13]  Kate Kearins,et al.  Gaining legitimacy? Sustainable development in business school curricula , 2001 .

[14]  Malene Leerberg,et al.  Design responsibility and sustainable design as reflective practice: an educational challenge , 2010 .

[15]  J. Hailey.  Management education for sustainable development , 1998 .

[16]  Alan E Kazdin,et al.  Psychological science's contributions to a sustainable environment: extending our reach to a grand challenge of society. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[17]  G. O’Brien,et al.  Sustainable development: mapping different approaches , 2005 .

[18]  Unstable identities: stable unsustainability , 2010 .