Rapid Learning of Earthquake Felt Area and Intensity Distribution with Real-time Search Engine Queries

Immediately after a destructive earthquake, the real-time seismological community has a major focus on rapidly estimating the felt area and the extent of ground shaking. This estimate provides critical guidance for government emergency response teams to conduct orderly rescue and recovery operations in the damaged areas. While considerable efforts have been made in this direction, it still remains a realistic challenge for gathering macro-seismic data in a timely, accurate and cost-effective manner. To this end, we introduce a new direction to improve the information acquisition through monitoring the real-time information-seeking behaviors in the search engine queries, which are submitted by tens of millions of users after earthquakes. Specifically, we provide a very efficient, robust and machine-learning-assisted method for mapping the user-reported ground shaking distribution through the large-scale analysis of real-time search queries from a dominant search engine in China. In our approach, each query is regarded as a “crowd sensor” with a certain weight of confidence to proactively report the shaking location and extent. By fitting the epicenters of earthquakes occurred in mainland China from 2014 to 2018 with well-designed machine learning models, we can efficiently learn the realistic weight of confidence for each search query and sketch the felt areas and intensity distributions for most of the earthquakes. Indeed, this approach paves the way for using real-time search engine queries to efficiently map earthquake felt area in the regions with a relatively large population of search engine users.

[1]  Benjamin Edwards,et al.  Predicting ground motion from induced earthquakes in geothermal areas , 2013 .

[2]  Dario Albarello,et al.  The Attenuation of Seismic Intensity in Italy, Part II: Modeling and Validation , 2008 .

[3]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Earthquake physics and real-time seismology , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[5]  Vincenzo Convertito,et al.  Rapid estimation of ground-shaking maps for seismic emergency management in the Campania Region of southern Italy , 2009 .

[6]  L. Burks,et al.  RAPID ESTIMATE OF GROUND SHAKING INTENSITY BY COMBINING SIMPLE EARTHQUAKE CHARACTERISTICS WITH TWEETS , 2014 .

[7]  Rémy Bossu,et al.  App Earthquake Detection and Automatic Mapping of Felt Area , 2018, Seismological Research Letters.

[8]  Luca D'Auria,et al.  Real-Time Mapping of Earthquake Perception Areas in the Italian Region from Twitter Streams Analysis , 2016 .

[9]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  The Status of Earthquake Early Warning around the World: An Introductory Overview , 2009 .

[10]  K. Campbell PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION USING THE HYBRID EMPIRICAL METHOD AND ITS USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GROUND-MOTION (ATTENUATION) RELATIONS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2003 .

[11]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Criteria for Selecting and Adjusting Ground-Motion Models for Specific Target Regions: Application to Central Europe and Rock Sites , 2006 .

[12]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  Improved Response to Disasters and Outbreaks by Tracking Population Movements with Mobile Phone Network Data: A Post-Earthquake Geospatial Study in Haiti , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[13]  Xiang Ding,et al.  Study on a modified assessment of seismic intensity based on both multi-source RS images and spatial grid analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[14]  Mitsuyuki Hoshiba,et al.  Outline of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) —Earthquake Early Warning and observed seismic intensity— , 2011 .

[15]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  TriNet “ShakeMaps”: Rapid Generation of Peak Ground Motion and Intensity Maps for Earthquakes in Southern California , 1999 .

[16]  Xuan Song,et al.  Prediction of human emergency behavior and their mobility following large-scale disaster , 2014, KDD.

[17]  Andrea Marchetti,et al.  EARS (earthquake alert and report system): a real time decision support system for earthquake crisis management , 2014, KDD.

[18]  G. Roe,et al.  REAL-TIME SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE MITIGATION , 2005 .

[19]  P. Earle,et al.  OMG Earthquake! Can Twitter Improve Earthquake Response? , 2009 .

[20]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California , 1999 .

[21]  David J. Wald,et al.  USGS "Did You Feel It?" internet-based macroseismic intensity maps , 2012 .

[22]  Yutaka Matsuo,et al.  Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors , 2010, WWW '10.

[23]  Mohammad Reza Saradjian,et al.  A GIS-based approach for earthquake loss estimation based on the immediate extraction of damaged buildings , 2017 .

[24]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[25]  Haoyu Zhang,et al.  Field investigation on severely damaged aseismic buildings in 2014 Ludian earthquake , 2015, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[26]  Xin Lu,et al.  Network Structure and Community Evolution on Twitter: Human Behavior Change in Response to the 2011 Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Vincenzo Convertito,et al.  Earthquake early warning system in southern Italy: Methodologies and performance evaluation , 2009 .

[28]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Earthquake early warning: Concepts, methods and physical grounds , 2011 .

[29]  Roger M.W. Musson,et al.  Intensity attenuation in the U.K. , 2005 .