Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility

With the sudden explosion of digital media content and access devices in the last generation, there is now more information available to more people from more sources than at any time in human history. Pockets of limited availability by geography or status notwithstanding, people now have ready access to almost inconceivably vast information repositories that are increasingly portable, accessible, and interactive in both delivery and formation. Basic human activities have changed as a result, and new possibilities have emerged. For instance, the process by which people locate, organize, and coordinate groups of individuals with shared interests, the number and nature of information and news sources available, and the ability to solicit and share opinions and ideas across myriad topics have all undergone dramatic change as a result of interconnected digital media. One result of this contemporary media landscape is that there exist incredible opportunities for learning, social connection, and individual entertainment and enhancement in a wide variety of forms. Indeed, recent evidence indicates that 45 percent of users in the United States say that the Internet played a crucial or important role in at least one major decision in their lives in the last two years, such as attaining additional career training, helping themselves or someone else with a major illness or medical condition, or making a major investment or financial decision. 1 Enhanced connectivity and information availability have changed not only what people know, but how they know what they know. However, the wide-scale access and multiplicity of sources that ensure vast information availability also make assessing the credibility of information extremely complex. The origin of information, its quality, and its veracity are now in many cases less clear than ever before, resulting in an unparalleled burden on individuals to locate appropriate information and assess its meaning and relevance accurately. Doing so is highly consequential: assessing credibility inaccurately can have serious social, personal, educational, relational, health, and financial consequences. As a result, determining trust, believability, and information bias— key elements of credibility—become critical as individuals process the information in their lives gleaned from digital media. Understanding credibility in this environment is also important because it is a concern that cuts across personal, social, and political domains. For instance, digital media increasingly deliver information that results (or fails to result) in an informed citizenry that, in turn, drives the pursuit of particular social agendas, the degree and nature of engagement …

[1]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph A. Konstan,et al.  Trust in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[3]  J. Ratner Human Factors and Web Development , 1997 .

[4]  C. Gary,et al.  Persuasion & Influence in American Life , 1992 .

[5]  R. L. Cromwell,et al.  Delving deeper into evaluation: exploring cognitive authority on the Internet , 2002 .

[6]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  W. E. Jurma Evaluations of Credibility of the Source of a Message , 1981 .

[8]  John S. Seiter,et al.  Persuasion: Social Inflence and Compliance Gaining , 2015 .

[9]  G. Eysenbach Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspectives and Implications for Youth , 2007 .

[10]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[11]  David M. Johnstone Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2001 .

[12]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  D. R. Danielson,et al.  How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants , 2003, DUX '03.

[14]  G. Miller,et al.  The effect of variations in Nonfluency on audience ratings of source credibility , 1964 .

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Credibility and computing technology , 1999, CACM.

[16]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[17]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[18]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[19]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Paradoxes of the Web: The Ethical Dimensions of Credibility , 2001, Libr. Trends.

[20]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility , 2000 .

[21]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment , 2003 .

[22]  Barbara K. Kaye,et al.  Using Is Believing: The Influence of Reliance on the Credibility of Online Political Information among Politically Interested Internet Users , 2000 .

[23]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Growing up digital , 2020, Transformative Digital Humanities.

[24]  Marsha Ann Tate,et al.  Web Wisdom: How To Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web , 1999 .

[25]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Why phishing works , 2006, CHI.

[26]  Denise E. Agosto A model of young people's decision-making in using the Web , 2002 .

[27]  Spiro K. Kiousis,et al.  Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age , 2001 .

[28]  M. Hamilton Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility , 1998 .

[29]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[30]  Gary Gumpert,et al.  Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World , 1983 .

[31]  Anne Morris,et al.  Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web , 2000 .

[32]  David Lankes,et al.  Challenges to Teaching Credibility Assessment in Contemporary Schooling , 2007 .

[33]  W. Bennett Civic Life Online : Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2007 .

[34]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  BIASED PRESS OR BIASED PUBLIC? ATTITUDES TOWARD MEDIA COVERAGE OF SOCIAL GROUPS , 1992 .

[35]  A. A. Lumsdaine Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[36]  Richard F. Carter,et al.  Newspapers or Television: Which Do You Believe? , 1965 .

[37]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Understanding Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the WWW , 1998 .

[38]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[39]  Denise E. Agosto Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures , 1998 .

[41]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[42]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification , 2007 .

[43]  James B. Lemert,et al.  DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES , 1969 .

[44]  Raya Fidel,et al.  A Visit to the Information Mall: Web Searching Behavior of High School Students , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[45]  M. Grace Trusting the Internet , 1998, British Dental Journal.

[46]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , 2007 .

[48]  Charles R. Martell,et al.  The Ubiquitous User: A Reexamination of Carlson's Deserted Library , 2005 .

[49]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[50]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .