Who Benefits from Twitter? Social Media and Political Competition in the U.S. House of Representatives
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Iyengar,et al. Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public , 2000 .
[2] M. Prior,et al. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections , 2003 .
[3] A. Abramowitz. Explaining Senate Election Outcomes , 1988, American Political Science Review.
[4] Philip E. Agre,et al. Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process , 2002, Inf. Soc..
[5] R. Dahl,et al. Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .
[6] J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al. Conceptualizing Information Integration in Government , 2015 .
[7] Soon Ae Chun,et al. Finding information in an era of abundance: Towards a collaborative tagging environment in government , 2010, Inf. Polity.
[8] Brian Groombridge,et al. The Effects of Mass Communication , 1965, Mental Health.
[9] Thomas J. Rudolph,et al. To Give or Not to Give: Modeling Individuals' Contribution Decisions , 2002 .
[10] M. Hindman. The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .
[11] Nathaniel N. Beck,et al. Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models , 1998 .
[12] Dean S. Karlan,et al. Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions , 2006 .
[13] W. Bennett,et al. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .
[14] Ellen L. Weintraub,et al. Campaign Finance and the 2008 Elections: How Small Change(s) Can Really Add Up , 2009 .
[15] J. S. Wright. Money and the Pollution of Politics: Is the First Amendment an Obstacle to Political Equality? , 1982 .
[16] John H. Aldrich. A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism , 1983, American Political Science Review.
[17] Christine B. Williams,et al. Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda , 2010, MIS Q..
[18] Paul T. Jaeger,et al. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..
[19] Michael A. Xenos,et al. Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement , 2007 .
[20] Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory , 1989 .
[21] W. Cho,et al. Prospecting for (campaign) gold , 2007 .
[22] Isabell M. Welpe,et al. Election Forecasts with Twitter - How 140 Characters Reflect the Political Landscape , 2011 .
[23] Henry E. Brady,et al. Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.
[24] Sounman Hong,et al. Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..
[25] Jesse M. Shapiro,et al. Media Bias and Reputation , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.
[26] Alan S. Gerber,et al. Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables , 1998, American Political Science Review.
[27] P. Lazarsfeld,et al. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .
[28] Donald P. Green,et al. Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections , 1988 .
[29] Sean A. Munson,et al. Social Media Technology and Government Transparency , 2010, Computer.
[30] P. Converse,et al. The American voter , 1960 .
[31] Michael J. Ensley. Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology , 2009 .
[32] A. Abramowitz. Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections , 1991, The Journal of Politics.
[33] C. Coglianese. Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .
[34] Andrew Rehfeld. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design , 2008 .
[35] Sounman Hong. Online Institutions, Markets, and Democracy , 2012 .
[36] Soon Ae Chun,et al. Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.
[37] Angus Campbell,et al. The American voter , 1960 .
[38] Henry E. Brady,et al. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .
[39] Jennifer Stromer-Galley. On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .
[40] Robert Stalnaker,et al. Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson , 2001 .
[41] Lynda W. Powell,et al. Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns , 1995 .
[42] Jock Given,et al. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.
[43] Paul T. Jaeger,et al. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..
[44] James G. Gimpel,et al. The Check Is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections , 2008 .
[45] G. Jacobson,et al. The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections , 1978, American Political Science Review.
[46] Stefano DellaVigna,et al. The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting , 2006 .
[47] Yochai Benkler,et al. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .
[49] Robert A. Dahl,et al. On Political Equality , 2006 .
[50] M. Baum,et al. Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse , 2007 .
[51] Daniel W. Drezner,et al. The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .
[52] David Strömberg,et al. Radio's Impact on Public Spending , 2004 .
[53] M. Ruffin. On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.
[54] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. , 2002 .
[55] C. Sunstein. Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .
[56] G. Jacobson,et al. The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Argument , 1990 .
[57] A. Gerber,et al. The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections , 1994, The Journal of Politics.
[58] N. Yang,et al. Twitter Adoption in Congress , 2010 .
[59] Woojin Moon. The Paradox of Less Effective Incumbent Spending: Theory and Tests , 2006, British Journal of Political Science.
[60] Bruce Bimber,et al. The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.
[61] Vincent G. Moscardelli. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.
[62] Shanto Iyengar,et al. Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs , 1982 .
[63] J. Lichtenberg,et al. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. , 1992 .
[64] M. Baum. Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit , 2005 .
[65] Theresa A. Pardo,et al. E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..
[66] Kay Lehman Schlozman,et al. Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists , 1999, American Political Science Review.
[67] G GimpelJames,et al. The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics , 2015 .
[68] Stephen Ansolabehere,et al. Why is There so Little Money in Politics , 2003 .
[69] Robert D. Putnam,et al. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.
[70] José Ramón Gil-García,et al. Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..
[71] K. Benoit,et al. The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending , 2008 .
[72] Soon Ae Chun,et al. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.
[73] Jane J. Mansbridge. Rethinking Representation , 2003, American Political Science Review.