Who Benefits from Twitter? Social Media and Political Competition in the U.S. House of Representatives

Many researchers have assumed that social media will reduce inequalities between elite politicians and those outside the political mainstream and that it will thus benefit democracy, as it circumvents the traditional media that focus too much on a few elite politicians. I test this assumption by investigating the association between U.S. Representatives using Twitter and their fundraising. Evidence suggests that (1) politicians’ adoptions of social media have yielded increased donations from outside their constituencies but little from within their own constituencies; (2) politicians with extreme ideologies tend to benefit more from their social media adoptions; and (3) the political use of social media may yield a more unequal distribution of financial resources among candidates. Finally, I discuss the implications of these findings for political equality, polarization, and democracy.

[1]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public , 2000 .

[2]  M. Prior,et al.  Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections , 2003 .

[3]  A. Abramowitz Explaining Senate Election Outcomes , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[5]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[6]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Conceptualizing Information Integration in Government , 2015 .

[7]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Finding information in an era of abundance: Towards a collaborative tagging environment in government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[8]  Brian Groombridge,et al.  The Effects of Mass Communication , 1965, Mental Health.

[9]  Thomas J. Rudolph,et al.  To Give or Not to Give: Modeling Individuals' Contribution Decisions , 2002 .

[10]  M. Hindman The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[11]  Nathaniel N. Beck,et al.  Beyond linearity by default: Generalized additive models , 1998 .

[12]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions , 2006 .

[13]  W. Bennett,et al.  A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .

[14]  Ellen L. Weintraub,et al.  Campaign Finance and the 2008 Elections: How Small Change(s) Can Really Add Up , 2009 .

[15]  J. S. Wright Money and the Pollution of Politics: Is the First Amendment an Obstacle to Political Equality? , 1982 .

[16]  John H. Aldrich A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda , 2010, MIS Q..

[18]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement , 2007 .

[20]  Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory , 1989 .

[21]  W. Cho,et al.  Prospecting for (campaign) gold , 2007 .

[22]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Election Forecasts with Twitter - How 140 Characters Reflect the Political Landscape , 2011 .

[23]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[24]  Sounman Hong,et al.  Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Media Bias and Reputation , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  Alan S. Gerber,et al.  Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[27]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[28]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections , 1988 .

[29]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Social Media Technology and Government Transparency , 2010, Computer.

[30]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[31]  Michael J. Ensley Individual campaign contributions and candidate ideology , 2009 .

[32]  A. Abramowitz Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[33]  C. Coglianese Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[34]  Andrew Rehfeld The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design , 2008 .

[35]  Sounman Hong Online Institutions, Markets, and Democracy , 2012 .

[36]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[37]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[38]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[39]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It , 2000 .

[40]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson , 2001 .

[41]  Lynda W. Powell,et al.  Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns , 1995 .

[42]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[43]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  James G. Gimpel,et al.  The Check Is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections , 2008 .

[45]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[46]  Stefano DellaVigna,et al.  The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting , 2006 .

[47]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[48]  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 18, Number 3—Summer 2004—Pages 117–133 Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World , 2022 .

[49]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  On Political Equality , 2006 .

[50]  M. Baum,et al.  Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse , 2007 .

[51]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[52]  David Strömberg,et al.  Radio's Impact on Public Spending , 2004 .

[53]  M. Ruffin On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[54]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. , 2002 .

[55]  C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 , 2007 .

[56]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Argument , 1990 .

[57]  A. Gerber,et al.  The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[58]  N. Yang,et al.  Twitter Adoption in Congress , 2010 .

[59]  Woojin Moon The Paradox of Less Effective Incumbent Spending: Theory and Tests , 2006, British Journal of Political Science.

[60]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.

[61]  Vincent G. Moscardelli The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[62]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs , 1982 .

[63]  J. Lichtenberg,et al.  Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. , 1992 .

[64]  M. Baum Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit , 2005 .

[65]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Kay Lehman Schlozman,et al.  Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[67]  G GimpelJames,et al.  The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions in American Politics , 2015 .

[68]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  Why is There so Little Money in Politics , 2003 .

[69]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[70]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[71]  K. Benoit,et al.  The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending , 2008 .

[72]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[73]  Jane J. Mansbridge Rethinking Representation , 2003, American Political Science Review.