Exploring the Characteristics of Innovation Adoption in Social Networks: Structure, Homophily, and Strategy

Exploration of the characteristics of innovation adoption in the context of social network will add new insights beyond the traditional innovation models. In this paper, we establish a new agent-based model to simulate the behaviors of agents in terms of innovation adoption. Specifically, we examine the effects of the network structure, homophily and strategy, among which homophily is a new topic in this field of innovation adoption. The experiments illustrate six important findings involving five aspects and their influences on the innovation adoption. The five aspects are initial conditions, homophily, network topology, rules of updating and strategy, respectively. This paper also compares the different cases within one aspect or across several aspects listed above. Accordingly, some management advices and future work are provided in the last part of this paper.

[1]  T. Valente,et al.  Accelerating the Diffusion of Innovations Using Opinion Leaders , 1999 .

[2]  M. Jackson,et al.  An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation , 2007 .

[3]  Paolo Pin,et al.  Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Paul Erdös,et al.  On random graphs, I , 1959 .

[5]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[7]  B. Golub,et al.  Naive Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence and Wisdom of Crowds , 2007 .

[8]  Mikael Sandberg,et al.  Soft Power, World System Dynamics, and Democratization: A Bass Model of Democracy Diffusion 1800-2000 , 2011, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  N. Derzko,et al.  Innovators and imitators in innovation diffusion modelling , 1988 .

[10]  Wander Jager,et al.  From the Special Issue Editors: Agent-Based Modeling of Innovation Diffusion , 2011 .

[11]  Timothy R. Gulden,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling as a Tool for Trade and Development Theory , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[13]  Dragan Jukic,et al.  Total least squares fitting Bass diffusion model , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[14]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[15]  The Spread of Innovations Through Social Learning , 2005 .

[16]  B. Golub,et al.  How Homophily Affects the Speed of Learning and Best Response Dynamics , 2012 .

[17]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[18]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[19]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Gang Peng,et al.  Network Structures and Online Technology Adoption , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach , 2009 .

[22]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[23]  Damon Centola.  Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action , 2013 .

[24]  Roman Chuhay.  Marketing Via Friends: Strategic Diffusion of Information in Social Networks with Homophily , 2010 .

[25]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions , 2010 .

[26]  Rosanna Garcia.  Uses of Agent-Based Modeling in Innovation/New Product Development Research , 2005 .

[27]  Peter Trkman,et al.  Bass Model Estimates for Broadband Diffusion in European Countries , 2012 .

[28]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Will It Spread or Not? The Effects of Social Influences and Network Topology on Innovation Diffusion , 2010 .

[29]  R. Calantone,et al.  The effects of market network heterogeneity on innovation diffusion: An agent-based modeling approach , 2010 .

[30]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[31]  Roch Guérin,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of Network Technology Adoption and the Role of Converters , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[32]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[33]  Stephen P. Ryan,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HETEROGENEITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION , 2011 .