A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects.

Compared with the currently widely used multi-step genomic models for genomic evaluation, single-step genomic models can provide more accurate genomic evaluation by jointly analyzing phenotypes and genotypes of all animals and can properly correct for the effect of genomic preselection on genetic evaluations. The objectives of this study were to introduce a single-step genomic model, allowing a direct estimation of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects, and to develop efficient computing algorithms for solving equations of the single-step SNP model. We proposed an alternative to the current single-step genomic model based on the genomic relationship matrix by including an additional step for estimating the effects of SNP markers. Our single-step SNP model allowed flexible modeling of SNP effects in terms of the number and variance of SNP markers. Moreover, our single-step SNP model included a residual polygenic effect with trait-specific variance for reducing inflation in genomic prediction. A kernel calculation of the SNP model involved repeated multiplications of the inverse of the pedigree relationship matrix of genotyped animals with a vector, for which numerical methods such as preconditioned conjugate gradients can be used. For estimating SNP effects, a special updating algorithm was proposed to separate residual polygenic effects from the SNP effects. We extended our single-step SNP model to general multiple-trait cases. By taking advantage of a block-diagonal (co)variance matrix of SNP effects, we showed how to estimate multivariate SNP effects in an efficient way. A general prediction formula was derived for candidates without phenotypes, which can be used for frequent, interim genomic evaluations without running the whole genomic evaluation process. We discussed various issues related to implementation of the single-step SNP model in Holstein populations with an across-country genomic reference population.

[1]  Z Liu,et al.  Use of MACE Results as Input for Genomic Models , 2011 .

[2]  Nicolas Gengler,et al.  Alternative single-step type genomic prediction equations , 2012 .

[3]  F. Reinhardt,et al.  Derivation and calculation of approximate reliabilities and daughter yield-deviations of a random regression test-day model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  P Madsen,et al.  Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[5]  M. Lidauer,et al.  Solving large mixed linear models using preconditioned conjugate gradient iteration. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  E. B. Burnside,et al.  Genetic evaluation for herd life in Canada. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Garrick,et al.  Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  I Misztal,et al.  Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  Rohan L. Fernando,et al.  Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[11]  I Misztal,et al.  Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  L R Schaeffer,et al.  Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  Raphael Mrode,et al.  Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values , 1996 .

[14]  I Misztal,et al.  Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[15]  Guosheng Su,et al.  Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[16]  Ignacy Misztal,et al.  Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[17]  G. Su,et al.  Different methods to calculate genomic predictions--comparisons of BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP). , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  Guosheng Su,et al.  A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[19]  M. Lund,et al.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[20]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[22]  G. Wiggans,et al.  Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  F. Seefried,et al.  Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  L. R. Schaeffer,et al.  Computing Strategies for Solving Mixed Model Equations , 1986 .

[25]  D. Harville Matrix Algebra From a Statistician's Perspective , 1998 .

[26]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  A Legarra,et al.  Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  I Misztal,et al.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  M. Calus,et al.  Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[30]  M Erbe,et al.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  V Ducrocq,et al.  Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.