Control rod treatment for FEM based radiation transport methods

Abstract This paper presents a novel control rod treatment for finite element method (FEM) based reactor physics simulations. The new method falls into the class of homogenization methods which treat material interfaces in mesh elements by defining a representative, homogenized nuclear cross section set. In contrast to existing homogenization based cusping treatments that attempt to approximate flux-volume weighting of the cross sections, we propose to exactly integrate terms appearing in the variational form of the transport or diffusion equation over mixed material elements. This goal is achieved by defining smoothly varying cross sections in elements that straddle material boundaries. It is shown that the smoothly varying cross sections can be obtained by projecting the piecewise set of cross sections onto the set of Legendre polynomials up to a finite order. Implementation of smoothly varying cross sections is supported within the Rattlesnake radiation multiphysics code at the Idaho National Laboratory. Homogenization methods traditionally suffer from cusping effects that originate from overestimation of absorption cross sections in strongly neutron-absorbing materials as found in control rods. We demonstrate that the presented method is (1) highly effective in removing cusping effects and (2) provides accurate results based on the C5G7-TD benchmark, a time-dependent version of the C5G7 benchmark.

[1]  Javier Ortensi,et al.  Physics-based multiscale coupling for full core nuclear reactor simulation , 2014 .

[2]  Yongping Wang,et al.  Comparison of two three-dimensional heterogeneous variational nodal methods for PWR control rod cusping effect and pin-by-pin calculation , 2017 .

[3]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  A Simple and Efficient Control Rod Cusping Model for Three-Dimensional Pin-by-Pin Core Calculations , 2004 .

[4]  G. Palmiotti,et al.  A Finite Subelement Generalization of the Variational Nodal Method , 2003 .

[5]  Jess C. Gehin A quasi-static polynomial nodal method for nuclear reactor analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Benjamin Collins,et al.  Subplane collision probabilities method applied to control rod cusping in 2D/1D , 2018, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[7]  Framatome Anp,et al.  REDUCING ROD CUSPING EFFECT IN NODAL EXPANSION METHOD CALCULATIONS , 2002 .

[8]  Vincent Laboure,et al.  Rattlesnake Theory Manual , 2018 .

[9]  Yung-An Chao,et al.  A theory of fuel management via backward diffusion calculation , 1986 .

[10]  Wei Shen,et al.  Investigation on generalized Variational Nodal Methods for heterogeneous nodes , 2017 .

[11]  Damián Ginestar,et al.  Moving meshes to solve the time-dependent neutron diffusion equation in hexagonal geometry , 2016, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[12]  Benjamin S. Kirk,et al.  Library for Parallel Adaptive Mesh Refinement / Coarsening Simulations , 2006 .

[13]  Nam Zin Cho,et al.  Kinetics Calculation Under Space-Dependent Feedback in Analytic Function Expansion Nodal Method via Solution Decomposition and Galerkin Scheme , 2002 .

[14]  김용희,et al.  A Bilinear Weighting Method for the Control Rod Cusping Problem in Nodal Methods , 1990 .