Fuzzy analytical hierarchical process based two way assessment for agile testing

Abstract Agile methods adopted in the software industries have given a new edge as well as scope to software outcomes. To determine anomalies that has been triggered by analytic hierarchical process (AHP) or any other fuzzy AHP methods in evaluation and selection in the establishment of two-way assessments of agile methods, a model methodology dependent on the AHP and fundamental hypothesis of the triangular fuzzy number (TFN) is depicted by communicating fuzzy AHP completely and numerically. In this paper we uncover the disagreement of Fuzzy analytic hierarchical process (FAHP) to decide the process which is considered best in agile according to the benchmark where semantic terms are correlated with triangular fuzzy numbers. Furthermore, the research paper also discovers the process that is considered best amongst the various criteria of decision-making issues for agile methodology. This paper further applies two-way assessment that discusses the viewpoint of software developers as well as managers and focuses on the significance of different identified attributes and then the overall utility is calculated considering the threshold measure from the perspective of the organization.

[1]  Fong-Jung Yu,et al.  Improving real estate broker service using TOPSIS method , 2009 .

[2]  P. K. Kapur,et al.  Measuring software testing efficiency using two-way assessment technique , 2014, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization.

[3]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[4]  Wang Xiaolin,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation assessment model to aviation maintenance safety risk based on grey fuzzy theory , 2018 .

[5]  Su-Mei Lin,et al.  The perspectives of store manager required competencies based on MCDM Method , 2010 .

[6]  Sun Qi,et al.  Study on Fuzzy Evaluation of the Quality of MOOC Teaching Based on AHP , 2018, 2018 13th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE).

[7]  H. Shuping,et al.  Study on partner selection of the agile supply chain based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics.

[8]  Che-Wei Chang,et al.  Using entropy to construct and evaluate player’s value and sustainable development model , 2019, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences.

[9]  Fuzzy subjective conflict analysis , 2009 .

[10]  Kongguo Zhu,et al.  Analysis on the optimum selection of science and technology industrialization projects based on AHP- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation , 2014, The 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014 CCDC).

[11]  Sunil Kumar Khatri,et al.  Selection of framework for implementing agile in software industry by fuzzy AHP approach , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS).

[12]  Y. C. Chou,et al.  Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for human resources in science technology (HRST) performance index selection , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[13]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  On The Development Of Agile Software Methodology Using Two Way Assessment , 2018, 2018 4th International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology (CICT).

[15]  A new weight representation using fuzzy set for partial inner dependence AHP , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Its Applications (iFuzzy).

[16]  Tzu-Ming Huang Key factors of the successful elevation of service quality by the service industry , 2013 .

[17]  A. Ramakrishna Rao,et al.  Resource Allocation in Project Scheduling Application of Fuzzy AHP , 2015 .