Practice-based Design of a Neighborhood Portal: Focusing on Elderly Tenants in a City Quarter Living Lab

This paper contributes to the current discourse on practice-based research in HCI paying particular attention to the overall temporal and situational conditions which frame an R&D project. We present a Living Lab study situated in an arbitrary neighborhood of a German city which develops ICT support to foster informal help and social interaction with a special, but not exclusive, focus on elderly tenants. We demonstrate that practice-based, long-term research in a city quarter goes beyond those challenges already described in the current Living Lab and PD literature. The long-term study's positioning in a real-world context is contoured not only by a high diversity of stakeholders and their individual interests and motivation for participation but also by their individual skill sets and learning needs. These distinct and often contradictive perspectives have to be permanently counterbalanced. Thus attention has to be focused on how related strategies and decisions impact on the design of the project as well as on the final ICT product. To enable all tenants, irrespective of age and technical skill, to participate in a long-term ICT-based community development project, we applied the format of 'experience-based PD workshops' to foster confidence in ICT usage and encourage the competency of the elderly and non-tech-savvy tenants.

[1]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  A living lab research approach for mobile TV , 2009, EuroITV '09.

[2]  P. Schofield.  A Companion to Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[3]  Volker Wulf,et al.  ICT-development in residential care settings: sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Film as invisible design: the example of the biometric daemon , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Participatory design in community informatics , 2007 .

[6]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Ambient kitchen: designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment , 2009, PETRA '09.

[7]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW , 2011, CSCW.

[8]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  What is the object of design? , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.

[10]  Alex Carmichael,et al.  Factors facilitating or impeding older adults’ creative contributions in the collaborative design of a novel DTV-based application , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals , 2013, CHI.

[12]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Research on research: design research at the margins: academia, industry and end-users , 2014, CHI.

[13]  P. Olivier,et al.  Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia , 2012, CHI.

[14]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ict , 2014, CHI.

[15]  Andy Crabtree,et al.  Ethnography in Participatory Design , 1998 .

[16]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[17]  J. Hughes,et al.  Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Dalsgård.  Aligning research and external stakeholder agendas in collaborative interaction design projects , 2010, OZCHI.

[19]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Addressing the subtleties in dementia care: pre-study & evaluation of a GPS monitoring system , 2014, CHI.

[20]  Kent Larson,et al.  A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings , 2012, CHI.

[22]  Francesco Molinari,et al.  Living Labs as multi-stakeholder platforms for the egovernance of innovation , 2011, ICEGOV '11.

[23]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda , 2014, CHI.

[24]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[25]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[26]  Gillian R. Hayes.  The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction , 2011, TCHI.

[27]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[28]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[29]  Jill Palzkill Woelfer,et al.  A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts , 2013, CHI.

[30]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab , 2013, CHI.

[31]  Tomas Sokoler,et al.  Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[32]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[33]  Wolfgang L. Zagler,et al.  Involvement of elderly citizens as potential end users of assistive technologies in the living lab Schwechat , 2009, PETRA '09.

[34]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  A milieu for innovation : defining living labs , 2009 .

[35]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Getting to the nub of neighbourhood interaction , 2008, PDC.

[36]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Successful Design and Uptake of Interactive Systems to Support Social Networks in Urban Neighborhoods , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[37]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design documentaries: inspiring design research through documentary film , 2006, DIS '06.

[38]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .