Impact of RAD51C-mediated Homologous Recombination on Genomic Integrity in Barrett’s Adenocarcinoma Cells

BACKGROUND In normal cells, RAD51-mediated homologous recombination (HR) is a precise DNA repair mechanism which plays a key role in the maintenance of genomic integrity and stability. However, elevated (dysregulated) RAD51 is implicated in genomic instability and is a potential target for treatment of certain cancers, including Barrett’s adenocarcinoma (BAC). In this study, we investigated genomic impact and translational significance of moderate vs. strong suppression of RAD51 in BAC cells. METHODS BAC cells (FLO-1 and OE33) were transduced with non-targeting control (CS) or RAD51-specific shRNAs, mediating a moderate (40–50%) suppression or strong (80-near 100%) suppression of the gene. DNA breaks, spontaneous or following exposure to DNA damaging agent, were examined by comet assay and 53BP1 staining. Gene expression was monitored by microarrays (Affymetrix). Homologous recombination (HR) and single strand annealing (SSA) activities were measured using plasmid based assays. RESULTS We show that although moderate suppression consistenly inhibits/reduces HR activity, the strong suppression is associated with increase in HR activity (by ~15 – ≥ 50% in various experiments), suggesting activation of RAD51-independent pathway. Contrary to moderate suppression, a strong suppression of RAD51 is associated with a significant induced DNA breaks as well as altered expression of genes involved in detection/processing of DNA breaks and apoptosis. Stronger RAD51 suppression was also associated with mutagenic single strand annealing mediated HR. Suppression of RAD51C inhibited RAD51-independent (SSA-mediated) HR in BAC cells. CONCLUSION Elevated (dysregulated) RAD51 in BAC is implicated in both the repair of DNA breaks as well as ongoing genomic rearrangements. Moderate suppression of this gene reduces HR activity, whereas strong or near complete suppression of this gene activates RAD51C-dependent HR involving a mechanism known as single strand annealing (SSA). SSA-mediated HR, which is a mutagenic HR pathway, further disrupts genomic integrity by increasing DNA breaks in BAC cells.

[1]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  Regulation of Single-Strand Annealing and its Role in Genome Maintenance. , 2016, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma , 2014, Nature Communications.

[3]  Min Yu,et al.  Targeting homologous recombination and telomerase in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma: Impact on telomere maintenance, genomic instability, and tumor growth , 2013, Oncogene.

[4]  Angela T. Noon,et al.  53BP1-mediated DNA double strand break repair: insert bad pun here. , 2011, DNA Repair.

[5]  N. Munshi,et al.  Genomic evolution in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma cells: critical roles of elevated hsRAD51, homologous recombination and Alu sequences in the genome , 2011, Oncogene.

[6]  Carl W. Miller,et al.  Chromosomal abnormalities and novel disease‐related regions in progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[7]  Carissa A. Sanchez,et al.  Chromosomal Instability and Copy Number Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Wei-Guo Zhu,et al.  The comet assay: a sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells. , 2009, Methods.

[9]  N. Munshi,et al.  Dysfunctional homologous recombination mediates genomic instability and progression in myeloma. , 2009, Blood.

[10]  Anja Gebauer,et al.  Single-Strand Annealing, Conservative Homologous Recombination, Nonhomologous DNA End Joining, and the Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by Sparsely or Densely Ionizing Radiation , 2009, Radiation research.

[11]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Role of DNA repair in the protection against genotoxic stress. , 2009, EXS.

[12]  Jianchun Cai,et al.  Microsatellite alterations in phenotypically normal esophageal squamous epithelium and metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. , 2008, World journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  H. Heng,et al.  The dynamics of cancer chromosomes and genomes , 2007, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[14]  P. Sung,et al.  Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  Carissa A. Sanchez,et al.  Chromosomal Instability in Barrett's Esophagus Is Related to Telomere Shortening , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  J. Carney,et al.  Mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA double strand break repair. , 2006, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[17]  J. Błasiak,et al.  [DNA homologous recombination repair in mammalian cells]. , 2006, Postepy biochemii.

[18]  D. Pittman,et al.  Extensive chromosomal instability in Rad51d-deficient mouse cells. , 2005, Cancer research.

[19]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  Genetic Steps of Mammalian Homologous Repair with Distinct Mutagenic Consequences , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  T. Helleday,et al.  The role of RAD51 in etoposide (VP16) resistance in small cell lung cancer , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[21]  S. Elledge,et al.  53BP1, a Mediator of the DNA Damage Checkpoint , 2002, Science.

[22]  G. Krauss,et al.  The XPC-HR23B complex displays high affinity and specificity for damaged DNA in a true-equilibrium fluorescence assay. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[23]  Cheng Li,et al.  Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application , 2001, Genome Biology.

[24]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  Cluster-Rasch models for microarray gene expression data , 2001, Genome Biology.

[25]  C. Wilson,et al.  XRCC2 Is a Nuclear RAD51-like Protein Required for Damage-dependent RAD51 Focus Formation without the Need for ATP Binding* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  J. Kononen,et al.  Multiple genes at 17q23 undergo amplification and overexpression in breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[27]  David J. Chen,et al.  Evidence for Simultaneous Protein Interactions between Human Rad51 Paralogs* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  H. Stürzbecher,et al.  DNA repair and recombination factor Rad51 is over-expressed in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2000, Oncogene.

[29]  N. Petrelli,et al.  The onset and extent of genomic instability in sporadic colorectal tumor progression. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  L. Thompson,et al.  XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. , 1999, Genes & development.

[31]  E. Sturgis,et al.  DNA repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from patients with head and neck cancer. , 1999, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[32]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instabilities in human cancers , 1998, Nature.

[33]  M. Rice,et al.  The human REC2/RAD51B gene acts as a DNA damage sensor by inducing G1 delay and hypersensitivity to ultraviolet irradiation. , 1998, Cancer research.

[34]  R. Weichselbaum,et al.  Xrcc3 Is Required for Assembly of Rad51 Complexes in Vivo * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic instability in colorectal cancers , 1997, Nature.

[36]  M. Cox,et al.  RecA protein: structure, function, and role in recombinational DNA repair. , 1997, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[37]  P. Baumann,et al.  Human Rad51 Protein Promotes ATP-Dependent Homologous Pairing and Strand Transfer Reactions In Vitro , 1996, Cell.

[38]  J. Haber,et al.  Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genetics.

[39]  B. Dave,et al.  Chromosome alterations in cancer development and apoptosis. , 1994, In vivo.

[40]  R. Fishel,et al.  Multiple Pathways Leading to Genomic Instabiligy and Tumorigenesis , 1994, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  S. West The processing of recombination intermediates: Mechanistic insights from studies of bacterial proteins , 1994, Cell.

[42]  A. Goddard,et al.  Chromosome aberrations and cancer. , 1991, Science.

[43]  B. Reid,et al.  Progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus is associated with genomic instability. , 1989, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[44]  E. Farber The multistep nature of cancer development. , 1984, Cancer research.

[45]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination , 1983, Cell.