Optimal preview-based stable-inversion for output tracking of nonminimum-phase linear systems

In this article, a new approach for output tracking of nonminimum-phase systems is proposed The proposed approach extends the preview-based stable inversion technique which utilizes the finite-previewed (in time) future desired trajectory to find the feedforward input (called inverse input) to achieve precision output-tracking of nonminimum-phase systems. It has been shown that the error in the inverse input can be rendered arbitrarily small provided the preview time is large enough Exact-output-tracking can be achieved if the entire future desired trajectory is known (i.e., the preview time extends to infinity). Therefore, having a large enough preview time is important to ensure the precision in the preview-based inverse input. The available preview time can be increased by using more powerful sensors. Or, alternatively, the need for preview time can be reduced by redesigning the trajectory, the system, or by using path following techniques. However, the available preview time is limited by physical constraints in applications such as active noise control. More generally, the available preview time is limited because of the associated cost and/or hardware limit. Therefore, we propose, in this article, the integration of optimal control with the preview- based stable-inversion to optimally exploit the available preview time. Specifically, we aim at obtaining the optimal preview- based inverse input by minimizing, within the preview time window, the predicted tracking error (under the preview-based inverse input) over the input energy. The properties of the optimal preview-based stable-inversion are discussed.

[1]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Precision preview-based stable-inversion for nonlinear nonminimum-phase systems: The VTOL example , 2007, Autom..

[2]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Aggressive flight maneuvers , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[4]  A. Kelkar,et al.  Modeling and Control of Acoustic Ducts , 2001 .

[5]  Veit Hagenmeyer,et al.  A new approach to inversion-based feedforward control design for nonlinear systems , 2005, Autom..

[6]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Preview Control for Vehicle Lateral Guidance in Highway Automation , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[7]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Vehicle Lateral Control for Highway Automation , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[8]  Aurelio Piazzi,et al.  Using stable input-output inversion for minimum-time feedforward constrained regulation of scalar systems , 2005, Autom..

[9]  Qingze Zou,et al.  Preview-Based Stable-Inversion for Output Tracking of Linear Systems , 1999 .

[10]  George Meyer,et al.  Stable inversion for nonlinear systems , 1997, Autom..

[11]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  ENTRY TRAJECTORY TRACKING LAW VIA FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION , 1998 .

[12]  N. Harris McClamroch,et al.  Tracking and maneuver regulation control for nonlinear nonminimum phase systems: application to flight control , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[13]  Edward J. Davison,et al.  Performance limitations of non-minimum phase systems in the servomechanism problem, , 1993, Autom..

[14]  Li Qiu,et al.  Limitations on maximal tracking accuracy , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Path-following for nonminimum phase systems removes performance limitations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  B. Paden,et al.  Nonlinear inversion-based output tracking , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..