Myocardial perfusion analysis in cardiac computed tomography angiographic images at rest

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a non-invasive method for anatomic evaluation of coronary artery stenoses. However, CTA is prone to artifacts that reduce the diagnostic accuracy to identify stenoses. Further, CTA does not allow for determination of the physiologic significance of the visualized stenoses. In this paper, we propose a new system to determine the physiologic manifestation of coronary stenoses by assessment of myocardial perfusion from typically acquired CTA images at rest. As a first step, we develop an automated segmentation method to delineate the left ventricle. Both endocardium and epicardium are compactly modeled with subdivision surfaces and coupled by explicit thickness representation. After initialization with five anatomical landmarks, the model is adapted to a target image by deformation increments including control vertex displacements and thickness variations guided by trained AdaBoost classifiers, and regularized by a prior of deformation increments from principal component analysis (PCA). The evaluation using a 5-fold cross-validation demonstrates the overall segmentation error to be 1.00 ± 0.39 mm for endocardium and 1.06 ± 0.43 mm for epicardium, with a boundary contour alignment error of 2.79 ± 0.52. Based on our LV model, two types of myocardial perfusion analyzes have been performed. One is a perfusion network analysis, which explores the correlation (as network edges) pattern of perfusion between all pairs of myocardial segments (as network nodes) defined in AHA 17-segment model. We find perfusion network display different patterns in the normal and disease groups, as divided by whether significant coronary stenosis is present in quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The other analysis is a clinical validation assessment of the ability of the developed algorithm to predict whether a patient has significant coronary stenosis when referenced to an invasive QCA ground truth standard. By training three machine learning techniques using three features of normalized perfusion intensity, transmural perfusion ratio, and myocardial wall thickness, we demonstrate AdaBoost to be slightly better than Naive Bayes and Random Forest by the area under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. For the AdaBoost algorithm, an optimal cut-point reveals an accuracy of 0.70, with sensitivity and specificity of 0.79 and 0.64, respectively. Our study shows perfusion analysis from CTA images acquired at rest is useful for providing physiologic information in diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery stenoses.

[1]  Olivier Ecabert,et al.  Segmentation of the heart and great vessels in CT images using a model-based adaptation framework , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  D. Berman,et al.  The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Lima,et al.  A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images, a review , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Charles T. Loop,et al.  Smooth Subdivision Surfaces Based on Triangles , 1987 .

[8]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  D. Berman,et al.  Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Shuiwang Ji,et al.  SLEP: Sparse Learning with Efficient Projections , 2011 .

[12]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Tust Techasith,et al.  Stress myocardial CT perfusion: an update and future perspective. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Four-Chamber Heart Modeling and Automatic Segmentation for 3-D Cardiac CT Volumes Using Marginal Space Learning and Steerable Features , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  A High-Resolution Atlas and Statistical Model of the Human Heart From Multislice CT , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Heart chambers and whole heart segmentation techniques: review , 2012, J. Electronic Imaging.

[18]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Damini Dey,et al.  Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. Neubauer,et al.  Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group , 2007, Heart.

[22]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Lima,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[25]  Roberto M. Lang,et al.  Volumetric quantification of myocardial perfusion using analysis of multi-detector computed tomography 3D datasets: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging , 2009, 2009 36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference (CinC).

[26]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[27]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Adenosine Stress 64- and 256-Row Detector Computed Tomography Angiography and Perfusion Imaging: A Pilot Study Evaluating the Transmural Extent of Perfusion Abnormalities to Predict Atherosclerosis Causing Myocardial Ischemia , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[28]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[29]  T van Walsum,et al.  Evaluation of a multi-atlas based method for segmentation of cardiac CTA data: a large-scale, multicenter, and multivendor study. , 2010, Medical physics.

[30]  Olivier Ecabert,et al.  Automatic Model-Based Segmentation of the Heart in CT Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation: Application to the heart and the caudate nucleus , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[33]  R. Cury,et al.  Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  A comprehensive shape model of the heart , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[35]  I. Meredith,et al.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. , 2012, European heart journal.