Statistical Damage Classification Using Sequential Probability Ratio Tests

The primary objective of damage detection is to ascertain with confidence if damage is present or not within a structure of interest. In this study, a damage classification problem is cast in the context of the statistical pattern recognition paradigm. First, a time prediction model, called an autoregressive and autoregressive with exogenous inputs (AR-ARX) model, is fit to a vibration signal measured during a normal operating condition of the structure. When a new time signal is recorded from an unknown state of the system, the prediction errors are computed for the new data set using the time prediction model. When the structure undergoes structural degradation, it is expected that the prediction errors will increase for the damage case. Based on this premise, a damage classifier is constructed using a sequential hypothesis testing technique called the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). The SPRT is one form of parametric statistical inference tests, and the adoption of the SPRT to damage detection problems can improve the early identification of conditions that could lead to performance degradation and safety concerns. The sequential test assumes a probability distribution of the sample data sets, and a Gaussian distribution of the sample data sets is often used. This assumption, however, might impose potentially misleading behavior on the extreme values of the data, i.e. those points in the tails of the distribution. As the problem of damage detection specifically focuses attention on the tails, the assumption of normality is likely to lead the analysis astray. To overcome this difficulty, the performance of the SPRT is improved by integrating extreme values statistics, which specifically models behavior in the tails of the distribution of interest into the SPRT.

[1]  R. Fisher,et al.  Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample , 1928, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  R. Khan,et al.  Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. , 1972 .

[4]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[5]  J. D. T. Oliveira,et al.  The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics , 1979 .

[6]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[7]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[8]  Kenny C. Gross,et al.  Sequential probability ratio tests for reactor signal validation and sensor surveillance applications , 1989 .

[9]  J. Angus Extreme Value Theory in Engineering , 1990 .

[10]  K. Gross,et al.  Sequential probability ratio test for nuclear plant component surveillance , 1991 .

[11]  C. Klüppelberg,et al.  Modelling Extremal Events , 1997 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[13]  S. Nadarajah,et al.  Extreme Value Distributions: Theory and Applications , 2000 .

[14]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques , 2001 .

[15]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals , 2001 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Application of frequency domain ARX features for linear and nonlinear structural damage identification , 2002, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.