Analysis of fiducial marker-based position verification in the external beam radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE Evaluate the fiducial marker-based position verification in the external-beam radiotherapy of patients with prostate cancer. METHODS Four hundred and fifty-three patients with prostate cancer received an IMRT treatment combined with fiducial marker-based position verification. Portal images were taken in all 35 treatment fractions. This database was used to study the accuracy of detecting the prostate position as well as the presence of time trends and the effectiveness of commonly used off-line correction protocols. RESULTS The variation in inter-marker distance shows that the prostate position can be detected with an accuracy better than 0.6 mm. Significant time trends in prostate position occurred in 35%, 18% and 48% of the patients in the vertical, lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively, with 34%, 9% and 35% deviating more than 3 mm over the course of the treatment. Off-line correction protocols that estimate a deviation only in the first fractions of the treatment (shrinking action level (SAL), no action level (NAL)) are not effective in following these trends. With daily off-line position correction using an adapted SAL protocol we reduced systematic positioning errors in clinical practice to less than 0.8 mm in all directions. CONCLUSION Fiducial markers are a reliable tool for prostate position verification. Time trends occur frequently. Correction procedures must take such trends into account.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  David A Jaffray,et al.  On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  The effect of an endorectal balloon and off-line correction on the interfraction systematic and random prostate position variations: a comparative study. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  D. Tremblay,et al.  Performing daily prostate targeting with a standard V-EPID and an automated radio-opaque marker detection algorithm. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  P Hofman,et al.  Detection of fiducial gold markers for automatic on-line megavoltage position verification using a marker extraction kernel (MEK). , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  John Wong,et al.  Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  T Haycocks,et al.  Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J Pouliot,et al.  Robustness and precision of an automatic marker detection algorithm for online prostate daily targeting using a standard V-EPID. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J C Stroom,et al.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Partial boosting of prostate tumours. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Comparison of megavoltage position verification for prostate irradiation based on bony anatomy and implanted fiducials. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Hans C J de Boer,et al.  Application of the No Action Level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  K. Lam,et al.  Retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients with implanted gold markers using off-line and adaptive therapy protocols. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Frank Van den Heuvel,et al.  Independent verification of ultrasound based image-guided radiation treatment, using electronic portal imaging and implanted gold markers. , 2003, Medical physics.

[26]  A Bel,et al.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  B. Heijmen,et al.  A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  P Hofman,et al.  Feasibility of automatic marker detection with an a-Si flat-panel imager. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Clinical feasibility study for the use of implanted gold seeds in the prostate as reliable positioning markers during megavoltage irradiation. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.