Dynamic Dependencies: A Geographic Investigation of Local Labor Markets*

Knowledge is grounded in experience, which in large part is rooted in the place-bound interactions of everyday life. We view labor market processes in the context of such interactions and explore the ways in which the experience-based knowledges of employers and employees construct labor markets within metropolitan areas and contribute to segmentation within the labor force. In-depth interviews with workers and employers in the manufactur- ing and producer services sectors of Worcester, Massachusetts, reveal the place-based processes through which local labor markets and segmentations develop. Employers prove to be astute social geographers, keenly aware of local variations in the residential landscape, locating their firms to win proximity to a local labor force having the particular characteristics deemed desirable. In recruiting workers, employers rely on strategies, such as advertisements in local newspapers and word of mouth, to ensure a localized labor force. Employers' rootedness in the local area and their reluctance to risk losing their current labor force by moving far reinforce the spatial divisions of labor they themselves helped to create through their locational and recruiting strategies. Employees, for their part, contribute to carving out small-scale labor markets through a preference for short journeys to work, a reliance on personal contacts in finding jobs, and through residential rootedness in particular parts of the metropolitan area. The sometimes microscopic labor markets that develop as a result have distinctive characteristics in terms of employment opportunities and wage levels. A geographic perspective shows that labor markets emerge from processes far more complex than economic exchange.

[1]  Tony Manwaring,et al.  The extended internal labour market , 1984 .

[2]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  The Sociological and Economic Approaches to Labor Market Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Neoclassical and Sociological Perspectives on Segmented Labor Markets , 1987 .

[4]  M. Hughes Employment Decentralization and Accessibility: A Strategy for Stimulating Regional Mobility , 1991 .

[5]  A. Scott,et al.  Metropolis: From the Division of Labor to Urban Form , 1988 .

[6]  G. Pratt,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING THE LINKS BETWEEN HOME AND WORK IN URBAN GEOGRAPHY , 1988 .

[7]  G. Spivak In Other Worlds , 1987 .

[8]  Albert Rees,et al.  Workers and Wages in an Urban Labor Market. , 1971 .

[9]  Plant Closings and Worker Displacement the Regional Issues , 1988 .

[10]  Jamie Peck,et al.  Reconceptualizing the local labour market , 1989 .

[11]  F. Block Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse , 1990 .

[12]  Geraldine Pratt,et al.  Job Search and the Occupational Segregation of Women , 1991 .

[13]  B. Wegener,et al.  Job Mobility and Social Ties: Social Resources, Prior Job, and Status Attainment , 1991 .

[14]  Geraldine Pratt,et al.  SPATIAL DIMENSIONS OF THE GENDER DIVISION OF LABOR IN A LOCAL LABOR MARKET , 1988 .

[15]  D. Harvey Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination1 , 1990 .

[16]  J. Humphries,et al.  The Reconstitution of the Supply Side of the Labour Market: The Relative Autonomy of Social Reproduction , 1984 .

[17]  M. Storper,et al.  The theory of labour and the theory of location , 1983 .

[18]  Michael Mann,et al.  The Working Class In The Labour Market , 1979 .

[19]  J. Vipond The Intra-Urban Unemployment Gradient: The Influence of Location on Unemployment , 1984 .