Learning and structure of neuronal networks

We study the effect of learning dynamics on network topology. Firstly, a network of discrete dynamical systems is considered for this purpose and the coupling strengths are made to evolve according to a temporal learning rule that is based on the paradigm of spike-time-dependent plasticity (STDP). This incorporates necessary competition between different edges. The final network we obtain is robust and has a broad degree distribution. Then we study the dynamics of the structure of a formal neural network. For properly chosen input signals, there exists a steady state with a residual network. We compare the motif profile of such a network with that of the real neural network of C. elegans and identify robust qualitative similarities. In particular, our extensive numerical simulations show that this STDP-driven resulting network is robust under variations of model parameters.

[1]  Areejit Samal,et al.  STDP-driven networks and the C. elegans neuronal network , 2010, 1004.5060.

[2]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[5]  R. Pan,et al.  Mesoscopic Organization Reveals the Constraints Governing Caenorhabditis elegans Nervous System , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  S. Brenner,et al.  The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[8]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Formation of feedforward networks and frequency synchrony by spike-timing-dependent plasticity , 2007, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[9]  N. Chatterjee,et al.  Understanding the mind of a worm: hierarchical network structure underlying nervous system function in C. elegans. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[10]  Axon Pruning: C. elegans Makes the Cut , 2005, Current Biology.

[11]  Jeff W. Lichtman,et al.  Axon Branch Removal at Developing Synapses by Axosome Shedding , 2004, Neuron.

[12]  J. Jost,et al.  Evolution of network structure by temporal learning , 2008, 0811.4306.

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[14]  Marc-Oliver Gewaltig,et al.  NEST (NEural Simulation Tool) , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[15]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Traub,et al.  Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus , 1991 .

[17]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW (Physics) , 2003 .

[18]  Thomas Wennekers,et al.  Finite State Automata Resulting from Temporal Information Maximization and a Temporal Learning Rule , 2005, Neural Computation.

[19]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW , 2004 .

[20]  Cornelis J Stam,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain , 2007, Nonlinear biomedical physics.

[21]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[22]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[23]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Sensory activity affects sensory axon development in C. elegans. , 1999, Development.

[24]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet , 2003 .

[26]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Structural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..