Collective Motion of Cells Mediates Segregation and Pattern Formation in Co-Cultures

Pattern formation by segregation of cell types is an important process during embryonic development. We show that an experimentally yet unexplored mechanism based on collective motility of segregating cells enhances the effects of known pattern formation mechanisms such as differential adhesion, mechanochemical interactions or cell migration directed by morphogens. To study in vitro cell segregation we use time-lapse videomicroscopy and quantitative analysis of the main features of the motion of individual cells or groups. Our observations have been extensive, typically involving the investigation of the development of patterns containing up to 200,000 cells. By either comparing keratocyte types with different collective motility characteristics or increasing cells' directional persistence by the inhibition of Rac1 GTP-ase we demonstrate that enhanced collective cell motility results in faster cell segregation leading to the formation of more extensive patterns. The growth of the characteristic scale of patterns generally follows an algebraic scaling law with exponent values up to 0.74 in the presence of collective motion, compared to significantly smaller exponents in case of diffusive motion.

[1]  A. Kabla,et al.  Collective cell migration: leadership, invasion and segregation , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Reconstruction of Zebrafish Early Embryonic Development by Scanned Light Sheet Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[3]  Akihiko Nakajima,et al.  Kinetics of the cellular Potts model revisited , 2011 .

[4]  T D Pollard,et al.  Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[5]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Quantitative differences in tissue surface tension influence zebrafish germ layer positioning , 2008, HFSP journal.

[6]  D. Beysens,et al.  Cell sorting is analogous to phase ordering in fluids. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  G. Parisi Brownian motion , 2005, Nature.

[8]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Rational design and characterization of a Rac GTPase-specific small molecule inhibitor. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. Forgacs,et al.  Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior. , 1996, Development.

[10]  Alba Diz-Muñoz,et al.  Control of Directed Cell Migration In Vivo by Membrane-to-Cortex Attachment , 2010, PLoS biology.

[11]  Aparna Baskaran,et al.  Spontaneous segregation of self-propelled particles with different motilities , 2012 .

[12]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  How amoeboids self-organize into a fruiting body: Multicellular coordination in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Hugues Chaté,et al.  Self-propelled particle model for cell-sorting phenomena. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[14]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. , 1963, Science.

[16]  Silke Henkes,et al.  Active jamming: self-propelled soft particles at high density. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  R. Fürth,et al.  Die Brownsche Bewegung bei Berücksichtigung einer Persistenz der Bewegungsrichtung. Mit Anwendungen auf die Bewegung lebender Infusorien , 1920 .

[19]  J. Murray,et al.  On the mechanochemical theory of biological pattern formation with application to vasculogenesis. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[20]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[21]  T. Takenawa,et al.  IRSp53 is an essential intermediate between Rac and WAVE in the regulation of membrane ruffling , 2000, Nature.

[22]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[23]  Gargi Maheshwari,et al.  Deconstructing (and reconstructing) cell migration , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[24]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of Tissues by Dissociated Cells , 1963 .

[25]  Yukinori Endo,et al.  A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective cell motion in endothelial monolayers , 2010, Physical biology.

[27]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Differential adhesion in morphogenesis: a modern view. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[28]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Modelling Morphogenesis: From Single Cells to Crawling Slugs. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.