Dual routes to cortical orienting responses: Novelty detection and uncertainty reduction

Sokolov distinguished between reactive and proactive variants of the orienting response (OR). The Novelty P3 is considered as an electrophysiological signature of the reactive OR. Recent work suggests that the proactive OR is reflected in frontally distributed P3 activity elicited by uncertainty-reducing stimuli in task-switching paradigms. Here, we directly compare the electrophysiological signatures of reactive and proactive ORs. Participants completed a novelty oddball task and a task-switching procedure while the electroencephalogram was measured. Novel and uncertainty-reducing stimuli evoked prominent fronto-centrally distributed Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 waves, respectively. We found a substantial negative correlation between Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 across participants, suggesting that reactive and proactive ORs converge on a common neural pathway, but also that distinguishable routes to orienting exist. Moreover, response accuracy was associated with reduced Novelty-P3 and enhanced Uncertainty-P3 amplitudes. The relation between Novelty P3 and Uncertainty P3 might serve as an index of individual differences in distractibility and cognitive control.

[1]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  D L Braff,et al.  Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Electrophysiologic and behavioral evidence. , 1990, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  D. A. Grant,et al.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R Näätänen,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reveal covert distractibility in closed head injuries. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[5]  Fiona McNab,et al.  Dissociating Distractor-Filtering at Encoding and During Maintenance , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  E. A. Berg,et al.  A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. , 1948, The Journal of general psychology.

[7]  M. Bradley Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Erik M Altmann,et al.  Advance Preparation in Task Switching , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Nelson A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Berrin Maraşligil,et al.  İnsanlarda Yenilik N2 Yanıtı Hedef Uyaranların Zamansal Sınıflamasını Yansıtır , 2011 .

[13]  B. Kopp,et al.  Electrophysiological indicators of surprise and entropy in dynamic task-switching environments , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[15]  F. Barceló The Madrid card sorting test (MCST): a task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[16]  Bruno Kopp,et al.  Fractionating the Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Orienting reflexes and significance: a reply to O'Gorman. , 1979, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Francisco Barceló,et al.  Task Switching and Novelty Processing Activate a Common Neural Network for Cognitive Control , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty , 2002, Neuroreport.

[20]  K. Wessel,et al.  Age-related changes in neural recruitment for cognitive control , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  A. S. Bernstein,et al.  The orienting response as novelty and significance detector: reply to O'Gorman. , 1979, Psychophysiology.

[22]  C. Escera,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of abnormal activation of the cerebral network of involuntary attention in alcoholism , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Nathaniel E. Anderson,et al.  P3a Amplitude Predicts Successful Treatment Program Completion in Substance-Dependent Individuals , 2011, Substance use & misuse.

[25]  A factor-analytic examination of the unitary or concept , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[26]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Engel,et al.  Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[29]  R. Barry,et al.  Single-trial event-related potentials and the orienting reflex to monaural tones. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  Moses M. Langley,et al.  Signaling a switch: neural correlates of task switching guided by task cues and transition cues. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Distracted by your mind? Individual differences in distractibility predict mind wandering. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[33]  S. M. Carlson,et al.  Inhibitory Control and Emotion Regulation in Preschool Children. , 2007 .

[34]  Cordula Hölig,et al.  To switch or not to switch: Brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features , 2010, Brain Research.

[35]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Event-Related Potentials , 2008 .

[36]  John Polich,et al.  P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[37]  D. Friedman,et al.  The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.