IEEE 802.11p unicast considered harmful

We study the feasibility of IEEE 802.11p unicast communication in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs). In brief, we found unicast communication using MAC acknowledgement frames (ACKs) to be unsuitable for vehicular networks, because missing ACKs make protocol operations susceptible to pronounced head of line blocking effects. Worse, a transmit queue that is blocked by a missing ACK will delay messages for all protocols running on the same node that use the same access category. Other than in traditional networks, missing ACKs are especially prevalent in VANETs due to their high topology dynamics. Depending on the scenario, delays of messages could be shown to reach 200 ms and beyond - above the tolerable range of many VANET applications. Our findings are based on analytical calculations, measurements on hardware, as well as computer simulations; we conducted simulations both at small scale, for a baseline validation, and at a macroscopic level, to gauge the impact on a more complex protocol.

[1]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  Mobility impact in IEEE 802.11p infrastructureless vehicular networks , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[2]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  How Shadowing Hurts Vehicular Communications and How Dynamic Beaconing Can Help , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[3]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Inter-vehicle communication: Quo vadis , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  A multi-channel VANET providing concurrent safety and commercial services , 2005, VANET '05.

[5]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[6]  Reinhard German,et al.  Bidirectionally Coupled Network and Road Traffic Simulation for Improved IVC Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[8]  D. Manivannan,et al.  Unicast routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks: A critical comparison and classification , 2009, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[9]  Maria Kihl,et al.  Reliable Geographical Multicast Routing in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks , 2007, WWIC.

[10]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  The Mobility Impact in IEEE 802.11p Infrastructureless Vehicular Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference - Fall.

[11]  Guillermo Acosta-Marum,et al.  Wave: A tutorial , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Masao Fukushima,et al.  V2X Communication Technology: Field Experience and Comparative Analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Towards inter-vehicle communication strategies for platooning support , 2014, 2014 7th International Workshop on Communication Technologies for Vehicles (Nets4Cars-Fall).

[14]  Satish K. Tripathi,et al.  Enhancing throughput over wireless LANs using channel state dependent packet scheduling , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[15]  Daniel F. Macedo,et al.  Vehicular networks using the IEEE 802.11p standard: An experimental analysis , 2014, Veh. Commun..

[16]  Georgios Karagiannis,et al.  Contention window analysis for beaconing in VANETs , 2011, 2011 7th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference.

[17]  José Santa,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of CAM and DENM Messaging Services in Vehicular Communications , 2014 .

[18]  Elmar Schoch,et al.  Communication patterns in VANETs , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Susana Sargento,et al.  Deploying Roadside Units in Sparse Vehicular Networks: What Really Works and What Does Not , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Yu Wang,et al.  Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey , 2007, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[21]  Alexey V. Vinel,et al.  Context-Aware Retransmission Scheme for Increased Reliability in Platooning Applications , 2014, Nets4Cars/Nets4Trains/Nets4Aircraft.

[22]  S. Yousefi,et al.  Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): Challenges and Perspectives , 2006, 2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[23]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[24]  Maria Kihl,et al.  Inter-vehicle communication systems: a survey , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[25]  Martin Lauer,et al.  Team AnnieWAY's Entry to the 2011 Grand Cooperative Driving Challenge , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Falko Dressler,et al.  Vehicular Networking , 2014 .