Complexity and Context: Emerging Forms of Collaborative Inter-Organizational Systems

ABSTRACT The paper analyses the collaborative development of emergent IOS in three data intensive industry sectors (telecommunications, news media, and financial services). The findings reveal that environmental complexities (the complexity of data consumption patterns and increased interdependence within value webs) require context-sensitive value exchanges operationalised within co-operatively developed commodity-like IT infrastructures. The paper concludes by examining the implications of the study findings for developing IOS to support pooled, sequential, and reciprocal inter-organisational interdependencies. INTRODUCTION The potential of inter-organisational co-operation has been advocated since the 1960s by researchers such as Kaufman (1966). From the 1970s to the early 1990s, researchers (e.g. Van de Ven, 1976; Provan, 1982; Borman, 1994) argued that an organisation should link with others in order to cope with its environment and reduce environmental uncertainty, and that inter-organisational systems (IOS) were essential in this regard. Traditionally, IOS operationalised sequential inter-organisational relationships and supported limited internal processes such as inbound logistics and outbound logistics. Such IOS configurations can be classified as 'value chain' to 'value chain' models involving bilateral relations between two firms (Howard, Vidgen and Powell, 2003). Normann and Ramirez (1993) argue that traditional notions about value creation are based on outdated assumptions with an upstream supplier providing inputs to a value chain, an organisation adding value to the inputs and subsequently passing outputs to the customer or next participant in the supply chain. Subsequently, Internet focused research such as Timmers (1999), Kaplan and Sawhney (2000), and Hayes and Finnegan (2005) focused attention on the development and exploitation of new IT-enabled business-to-business models. While the focus was on e-business, the operationalisation of such linkages is characterised as IOS. Timmers (1999) sees new business models emerging from linkages between elements of the value chains of different organisations. Consequently, the boundary between organizations and their supply-chain partners is becoming even less distinct with interdependencies between them being more important (Hughes, Powell, Panteli and Golden 2004; Gulati and Kletter, 2005; Premkumar, Ramamurthy and Saunders 2005). Further, El Sawy, Malhotra, Gosain and Young (1999) argue that organisations that survive in this type of dynamic environment will need to be innovative in order to create new approaches to delivering value and will, as a result, have to employ altered enterprise structures and IT infrastructures. Thus, while increasing environmental complexity and technological innovation have led some organisational networks to explore more dynamic IOS models (Baron, Shaw and Bailey 2000; Howard, Vidgen and Powell 2003), empirical research on such systems is sparse and our conceptualisations of IOS need to be updated to include them (Hong, 2002). This paper reports on a study that explores the regulatory, economic, socio-cultural, technological and other inter-organisational environments that facilitated the development of IOS in three data intensive industry sectors (telecommunications, news media, and financial services). We firstly discuss the theoretical foundations for the study by examining the need to revisit IOS theory due to changing business requirements and enabling technology. Next, we explain the methodological approach used for the study. The findings illustrate that emerging IOS can help overcome the complexities of data consumption and value webs by facilitating standardisation and customisation for participants utilising context-sensitive value exchanges. This requires the development of a commoditised IOS infrastructure and higher co-operation levels amongst participants. We conclude by proposing an update to our conceptualisation of IOS by outlining an extension to an IOS framework developed by Kumar and Van Dissel (1996). …

[1]  M. Morton,et al.  Electronic data interchange: How much competitive advantage? , 1990 .

[2]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  John Hagel Out of The Box: Strategies for Achieving Profits Today and Growth Tomorrow Through Web Services , 2002 .

[4]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[6]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  XML - Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Linkages and Influence Over Decision Making , 1982 .

[8]  Reima Suomi,et al.  What to Take into Account When Building an Inter-Organizational Information System , 1994, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  P. Timmers Electronic Commerce: Strategies and Models for Business-to-Business Trading , 2000 .

[10]  Robert M. O'Keefe,et al.  Trust, planning and benefits in a global interorganizational system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Benn R. Konsynski,et al.  Uses and Consequences of Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation in the Aircraft Parts Industry , 1998, MIS Q..

[12]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[14]  William G. Chismar,et al.  A model of competing interorganizational systems and its application to airline reservation systems , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  J. C. Henderson PLUGGING INTO STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS: THE CRITICAL IS CONNECTION , 1990 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[17]  Thomas S. Wurster,et al.  Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy , 1999 .

[18]  Kai Reimers Standardizing the New E-Business Platform: Learning From the EDI Experience , 2001, Electron. Mark..

[19]  David B. Kletter,et al.  Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organizations , 2005 .

[20]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[21]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Ownership and Investment in Electronic Networks , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Digital capital: harnessing the power of business Webs , 2000, UBIQ.

[23]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[24]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Analysing Business Interaction in a Virtual Organisation: Using Business Action Theory to Study Complex Inter-Organisational Contexts , 2003, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[25]  M. Sawhney,et al.  E-hubs: the new B2B (business-to-business) marketplaces. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[26]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Assessing the of potential of e-business models: towards a framework for assisting decision-makers , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[28]  Philip Powell,et al.  Overcoming stakeholder barriers in the automotive industry: building to order with extra-organizational systems , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.  EDI System Integration: A Definition and Literature Survey , 1992, Inf. Soc..

[30]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  IT-Intensive Value Innovation in the Electronic Economy: Insights From Marshall Industries , 1999, MIS Q..

[31]  E. Guba,et al.  Effective Evaluation: Improving The Usefulness Of Evaluation Results Through Responsive And Naturalistic Approaches , 1981 .

[32]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Racing the E-Bomb: How the Internet Is Redefining Information Systems Development Methodology , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[33]  Keng Siau,et al.  Interorganizational Systems and Competitive Advantages – Lessons from History , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Web-based e-catalog systems in B2B procurement , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[36]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[37]  Philip Powell,et al.  Inter-Organisational Systems, Strategy and Structure: the case for planning environments , 1998, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Proprietary versus internet technologies and the adoption and impact of electronic marketplaces , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[40]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Mark Borman Common knowledge, interorganizational networks and the future for the organization of production , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[43]  Philip Powell,et al.  Risk Mitigation and Risk Absorption in IOS: A Proposed Investigative Study , 2004, ECIS.

[44]  Steve Scala,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of electronic data interchange an industry perspective , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.