Constructability rules: guidelines for successful application to bespoke buildings

It is widely recognized that building design has a significant impact on construction productivity and quality. Constructability rules are one way of transferring construction knowledge to building designers. These rules are statements, such as ‘design for minimum time below ground’, which encapsulate a specific aspect of construction best practice. Although constructability rules are relatively easy to formulate and/or obtain, there is little evidence of their successful application. Indeed, architects continue to be held responsible for productivity and quality problems because of their lack of construction knowledge. This paper reports research that informed and included the development of guidelines for successful application of constructability rules to bespoke buildings - those being buildings that are designed to fulfil the requirements of one particular client and/or a single specific location. Findings suggest that there are actions that can be taken to widen the application of rules and increase their success. Potential sources for rules are described. Guidelines are introduced, and information about how they can be actioned by different construction organizations is provided.

[1]  Geoffrey Boothroyd,et al.  Product design for manufacture and assembly , 1994, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Mike Kagioglou Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol: Final Report , 1998 .

[3]  A Scott Howe,et al.  Designing for Automated Construction , 1997, CAADRIA proceedings.

[4]  Albert P.C. Chan Evaluation of enhanced design and build system a case study of a hospital project , 2000 .

[5]  Boyd C. Paulson,et al.  Value-added assessment of construction plans , 1999 .

[6]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Concurrent engineering : a strategy for procuring construction projects , 1998 .

[7]  Alan D. Russell,et al.  Developing a Draft Schedule Using Templates and Rules , 2001 .

[8]  Abraham Warszawski,et al.  Robotics in building construction , 1985 .

[9]  Stuart D. Anderson,et al.  Integrating constructability tools into constructability review process , 2000 .

[10]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  An Investigation of the Readiness of the Construction Industry for Concurrent Engineering , 2002 .

[11]  D. H. Besterfield Quality control , 1979 .

[12]  James T. O'Connor,et al.  Collecting Constructability Improvement Ideas , 1986 .

[13]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Characteristics of Design-Relevant Constructability Knowledge , 1997 .

[14]  Allan Ashworth,et al.  Added Value in Design and Construction , 2000 .

[15]  S S Ray,et al.  BRIDGES - DESIGN FOR IMPROVED BUILDABILITY , 1996 .

[16]  J. Enns,et al.  What competition? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Thomas Fasth,et al.  Knowledge based engineering for SMEs , 2000 .

[18]  L. Delbeke Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt , 1980 .

[19]  P. J. Lovett,et al.  A little knowledge is a wondrous thing [CAD] , 1999 .

[20]  R. Pascale Managing on the Edge , 1990 .

[21]  Stewart Adams Practical buildability : CIRIA building design report , 1989 .

[22]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[23]  T Chamberlain,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY INSTITUTE , 1990 .