Functional Role of Large Organisms in Intertidal Communities: Community Effects and Ecosystem Function

In marine soft sediments, large organisms are potentially important players in the nonlinear interactions that occur among animals, their food, and their chemical environment, all of which influence the contribution of benthos to ecosystem function. We investigated the consequences of removing large individuals of two functionally contrasting benthic communities on nutrient regeneration, microphyte standing stock, and macrobenthic community composition. The experiment was conducted at two adjacent sites that were physically similar but biologically different, one dominated by large deposit feeders and the other by large suspension feeders. Chemical fluxes were measured in experimental plots, and sediments were sampled to assess changes in macrofauna, sediment grain size, organic content, and microphyte standing stock. Our results demonstrate that the removal of large suspension feeders or deposit feeders influenced the flux of nitrogen and oxygen, surficial sediment characteristics, and community composition. In the deposit-feeder community, interactions between nutrient regeneration and grazing highlight important feedbacks between large macrofauna and biogeochemical processes and production by microphytes, indicating that the loss of large infauna driven by increased rates of anthropogenic disturbance may lead to functional extinction and cause shifts in community structure and ecosystem performance.

[1]  J. Emmett Duffy.  Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning , 2003 .

[2]  D. Wardle,et al.  The Influence of Island Area on Ecosystem Properties , 1997 .

[3]  Trevor Tolhurst,et al.  Destabilization of Cohesive Intertidal Sediments by Infauna , 2001 .

[4]  David C. Schneider,et al.  Matching the outcome of small-scale density manipulation experiments with larger scale patterns: an example of bivalve adult/juvenile interactions , 1997 .

[5]  R. Glud,et al.  Flow-induced flushing of relict tube structures in the central Skagerrak (Norway) , 2002 .

[6]  S. Thrush,et al.  Seabed drag coefficient over natural beds of horse mussels (Atrina zelandica) , 1998 .

[7]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[8]  J. Jackson.  What was natural in the coastal oceans? , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  T. J. Smith,et al.  Bioaccumulation and elimination of chlordane by selected intertidal benthic fauna , 1993 .

[10]  C. Heip,et al.  Biodiversity links above and below the marine sediment–water interface that may influence community stability , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[12]  M. Tegner,et al.  SLIDING BASELINES, GHOSTS, AND REDUCED EXPECTATIONS IN KELP FOREST COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[13]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments , 2003 .

[14]  C. W. Thayer.  Sediment-Mediated Biological Disturbance and the Evolution of Marine Benthos , 1983 .

[15]  R. Whitlatch,et al.  Recovery Dynamics in Benthic Communities: Balancing Detail with Simplification , 2001 .

[16]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  MACROBENTHIC RECOVERY PROCESSES FOLLOWING CATASTROPHIC SEDIMENTATION ON ESTUARINE SANDFLATS , 2003 .

[17]  Ronnie N. Glud,et al.  Small‐scale spatial and temporal variability in coastal benthic O2 dynamics: Effects of fauna activity , 2004 .

[18]  John S. Gray,et al.  Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[19]  C. Heip,et al.  Ecology of estuarine macrobenthos , 1999 .

[20]  A. Covich,et al.  The Function of Marine Critical Transition Zones and the Importance of Sediment Biodiversity , 2001, Ecosystems.

[21]  B. Eyre,et al.  Effect of natural populations of burrowing thalassinidean shrimp on sediment irrigation, benthic metabolism, nutrient fluxes and denitrification , 2004 .

[22]  Paul K Dayton,et al.  The Importance of the Natural Sciences to Conservation , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[23]  R. Marinelli,et al.  Evidence for density-dependent effects of infauna on sediment biogeochemistry and benthic–pelagic coupling in nearshore systems , 2003 .

[24]  George H. Leonard,et al.  THE ROLE OF POSITIVE INTERACTIONS IN COMMUNITIES: LESSONS FROM INTERTIDAL HABITATS , 1997 .

[25]  Amy J. Symstad,et al.  Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments , 2003 .

[26]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Identifying relationships between adult and juvenile bivalves at different spatial scales , 1997 .

[27]  R. Westbrooks,et al.  Extinction and Ecosystem Function in the Marine Benthos , 2004 .

[28]  S. Thrush,et al.  Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions , 2004, Nature.

[29]  B. Rygg,et al.  Bioturbation and irrigation in natural sediments, described by animal-community parameters , 2000 .

[30]  Robert H. Findlay,et al.  Laboratory study of disturbance in marine sediments: response of a microbial community , 1990 .

[31]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  Benthic faunal responses to variations in patch density and patch size of a suspension-feeding bivalve , 1997 .

[32]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  Assessing the short‐term stability of spatial patterns of macrobenthos in a dynamic estuarine system , 1997 .

[33]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[34]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[35]  P. McCall,et al.  Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities , 1983 .

[36]  S. Thrush,et al.  Terrestrially derived sediment: response of marine macrobenthic communities to thin terrigenous deposits , 2004 .

[37]  J. P. Grime.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function: The Debate Deepens , 1997, Science.

[38]  K. Reise.  Ecological Comparisons of Sedimentary Shores , 2012, Ecological Studies.

[39]  M. Huxham,et al.  Diversity, biomass and ecosystem processes in the marine benthos. , 2002 .

[40]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  The importance of predators on a sandflat: interplay between seasonal changes in prey densities and predator effects , 1994 .

[41]  M. Austen,et al.  Experimental evidence for the role of Brissopsis lyrifera (Forbes, 1841) as a critical species in the maintenance of benthic diversity and the modification of sediment chemistry , 1998 .

[42]  S. Lindsay,et al.  Process-specific cues for recruitment in sedimentary environments : Geochemical signals ? , 1998 .

[43]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  Scale-Dependent Recolonization: The Role of Sediment Stability in a Dynamic Sandflat Habitat , 1996 .

[44]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  Adult/juvenile interactions of infaunal bivalves: contrasting outcomes in different habitats , 1996 .

[45]  R. Pridmore,et al.  Adult infauna as facilitators of colonization on intertidal sandflats , 1992 .

[46]  R. Pridmore,et al.  Matching patterns with processes: predicting the effect of size and mobility on the spatial distributions of the bivalves Macomona liliana and Austrovenus stutchburyi , 1996 .

[47]  J. Beukema,et al.  A long-term study of the recovery of the macrozoobenthos on large defaunated plots on a tidal flat in the Wadden Sea , 1999 .