A Computational Narrative Analysis of Children-Parent Attachment Relationships

Children narratives implicitly represent their experiences and emotions. The relationships infants establish with their environment will shape their relationships with others and the concept of themselves. In this context, the Attachment Story Completion Task (ASCT) contains a series of unfinished stories to project the self in relation to attachment. Unfinished story procedures present a dilemma which needs to be solved and a codification of the secure, secure/insecure or insecure attachment categories. This paper analyses a story-corpus to explain 3 to 6 year old children-parent attachment relationships. It is a computational approach to exploring attachment representational models in two unfinished story-lines: "The stolen bike" and "The present". The resulting corpora contains 184 stories in one corpus and 170 stories in the other. The Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) computational frameworks observe the emotions which children project. As a result, the computational analysis of the children mental representational model, in both corpora, have shown to be comparable to expert judgements in attachment categorization.

[1]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  An organizational perspective on attachment beyond infancy: Implications for theory, measurement, and research. , 1990 .

[2]  Maite Román.  METODOLOGÍAS PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DEL APEGO INFANTIL: DE LA OBSERVACIÓN DE CONDUCTAS A LA EXPLORACIÓN DE LAS REPRESENTACIONES MENTALES METHODS OF ASSESSING ATTACHMENT IN INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD: FROM OBSERVATION OF BEHAVIOURS TO EXPLORATION OF MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS , 2011 .

[3]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. , 1998 .

[4]  Nerea Portu-Zapirain.  Attachment Relationships with Fathers and Mothers during Early Chilhood , 2013 .

[5]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Socialization of Emotion Regulation in the Family. , 2007 .

[6]  D. Oppenheim.  The Attachment Doll-play Interview for Preschoolers , 1997 .

[7]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students , 2004 .

[8]  A. Marcoen,et al.  Representation of self and socioemotional competence in kindergartners: differential and combined effects of attachment to mother and to father. , 1999, Child development.

[9]  J. Cassidy.  Emotion regulation: influences of attachment relationships. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[10]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  W. Kintsch.  Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  S. Rochester.  The significance of pauses in spontaneous speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[13]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[14]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI): TREC-3 Report , 1994, TREC.

[15]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[16]  Inge Bretherton,et al.  In Pursuit of the Internal Working Model Construct and Its Relevance to Attachment Relationships. , 2005 .

[17]  M. Louwerse.  Embodied relations are encoded in language , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[20]  Patrick F. Reidy.  An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[22]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[23]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  The latent semantic analysis theory of knowledge , 1997 .

[24]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Select-a-Kibitzer: A Computer Tool that Gives Meaningful Feedback on Student Compositions , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[25]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective computing: challenges , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  John Bowlby,et al.  Attachment and Loss. Vol. I. Attachment. , 1970 .