Measurement equivalence of the German Job Satisfaction Survey used in a multinational organization: implications of Schwartz's culture model.

The authors tested measurement equivalence of the German Job Satisfaction Survey (GJSS) using structural equation modeling methodology. Employees from 18 countries and areas provided data on 5 job satisfaction facets. The effects of language and culture on measurement equivalence were examined. A cultural distance hypothesis, based on S. H. Schwartz's (1999) theory, was tested with 4 cultural groups: West Europe, English speaking, Latin America, and Far East. Findings indicated the robustness of the GJSS in terms of measurement equivalence across countries. The survey maintained high transportability across countries speaking the same language and countries sharing similar cultural backgrounds. Consistent with Schwartz's model, a cultural distance effect on scale transportability among scales used in maximally dissimilar cultures was detected. Scales used in the West Europe group showed greater equivalence to scales used in the English-speaking and Latin America groups than scales used in the Far East group.

[1]  D. J. Jackson,et al.  Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research. , 1983 .

[2]  Barbara M Byrne,et al.  Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  David Chan,et al.  The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM) , 1998 .

[4]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. , 1982 .

[5]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology , 1996 .

[6]  K. Bollen.  A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[7]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Locus of Control and Well-Being at Work: How Generalizable are Western Findings? , 2002 .

[8]  T. Little.  Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Measurement in the psychology of adulthood and aging. , 1985 .

[10]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[11]  Affektiver Halo in Mitarbeiterbefragungen , 2003 .

[12]  N. Schmitt,et al.  The Use Of Analysis Of Covariance Structures To Assess Beta And Gamma Change. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  M. Coovert,et al.  An Expert System for Integrating Multiple Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 2000 .

[14]  R. Trimpop.  Union commitment: Conceptual changes in the German context , 1995 .

[15]  S. Schwartz.  A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work , 1999 .

[16]  C. Werts,et al.  The Use Of Analysis Of Covariance Structures For Comparing The Psychometric Properties Of Multiple Variables Across Populations. , 1978, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[18]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  An international study of the psychometric properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994 : a comparison of individual and country/province level results , 2001 .

[19]  J. Horn,et al.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. , 1992, Experimental aging research.

[20]  R. Kanfer,et al.  Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. , 1985, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[22]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, and Korean versions of the general self-efficacy scale , 1997 .

[23]  Gregory L. Candell,et al.  Cross-Language and Cross-Cultural Comparisons in Scale Translations , 1986 .

[24]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[25]  K. Jöreskog.  Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations , 1971 .

[26]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[27]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[29]  F. Drasgow.  Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues , 1984 .

[30]  Ingwer Borg,et al.  Work values in East and West Germany: different weights, but identical structures , 1996 .

[31]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  A Psychometric Theory of Evaluations of Item and Scale Translations , 1987 .

[32]  Sandra B. Hartog,et al.  Alpha, beta, and gamma change in evaluation research: A structural equation approach. , 1988 .

[33]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling , 2000 .

[34]  I. Borg,et al.  Führungsinstrument Mitarbeiterbefragung. Theorien, Tools und Praxiserfahrungen (2. Auflage). , 2001 .

[35]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[36]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[37]  D. Sörbom.  A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[38]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[39]  David Chan,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTITUDE SURVEYS IN A MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATION: CONSIDERING LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN ASSESSING MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE , 1999 .

[40]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[41]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[42]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. , 1987 .

[43]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for assessing change during organizational entry , 1989 .

[44]  W. Meredith.  Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[45]  R E Millsap,et al.  Confirmatory Measurement Model Comparisons Using Latent Means. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[46]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Cultural clusters: methodology and findings , 2002 .

[47]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Multitrait-Multimethod Comparisons Across Populations: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[48]  S. Mulaik.  Confirmatory factor analysis. , 1988 .

[49]  L. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[50]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[51]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[52]  C. Hulin,et al.  Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the job descriptive index into Hebrew , 1986 .

[53]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[54]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[55]  Ronald Cohen,et al.  A handbook of method in cultural anthropology , 1973 .

[56]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[57]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[58]  D. Weiss,et al.  Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. , 1967 .

[59]  Y. Poortinga.  Equivalence of cross-cultural data: an overview of basic issues. , 1989, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[60]  Barbara B. Ellis,et al.  Differential item functioning: implications for test translations , 1989 .

[61]  Allan H. Church,et al.  Designing and using organizational surveys : a seven-step process , 2001 .

[62]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[63]  Joseph Soeters,et al.  Comparing cultures : dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective , 2004 .

[64]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[65]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[66]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?: , 1994 .

[67]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[68]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Influences of Adaptation to Communist Rule on Value Priorities in Eastern Europe , 1997 .

[69]  J. Tisak,et al.  Psychometric equivalence of a translated circadian rhythm questionnaire: implications for between- and within-population assessments. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  D. Watkins,et al.  The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research , 1989 .