Ethical Aspects concerning Instrument Separation and Perforations during Endodontic Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study

Aim During endodontic treatment, dentists may face various unwanted procedural accidents, at any stage of the treatment that might compromise endodontic treatment outcome and bring obstacles to dentists as well. This study aimed to address and analyze several ethical concerns relating to the behavioural conduct of dentists towards endodontic instrument separation as well as perforation of the crown and/or root during root canal treatment in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method Hundred and eleven questionnaires were distributed among dentists working in Riyadh in university clinics and government and private sectors. Data were collected, reviewed, and statistically analyzed by Fisher's exact and chi-square tests at a 5% significance level, using SPSS software. Results 54.5% of the respondents have encountered instrument separation. 53.2% stated that they would inform the patient about the instrument separation. 43.6% of the respondents had experienced perforation during root canal treatment, and 54.9% reported that they would inform the patient of the accident. Conclusion Within the limitation of this survey, we concluded that most of the dental professionals did not hesitate to adhere to the correct ethical conduct, and they would inform the patient if an incident occurred.

[1]  Muhammad Sohail Zafar,et al.  Aspects of Clinical Malpractice in Endodontics , 2019, European Journal of Dentistry.

[2]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  E. Marinelli,et al.  A 15 years survey for dental malpractice claims in Rome, Italy. , 2018, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[4]  Manoj Ramugade,et al.  A Review of Medicolegal Considerations of Endodontic Practice for General Dental Practitioners , 2018, Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry.

[5]  A. Bårdsen,et al.  Impact of Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps in an Undergraduate Student Clinic , 2018, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  Nafeesa Tabassum,et al.  Patient’s attitude towards dental treatment: treatment plan versus patient willingness , 2017 .

[7]  S. Pagano,et al.  Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review. , 2017, European journal of paediatric dentistry.

[8]  R. Palma-Dibb,et al.  Influence of operating microscope in the sealing of cervical perforations , 2016, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[9]  T. Shibu,et al.  An evaluation of ethical aspects concerning endodontic instrument fracture , 2015 .

[10]  R. Story Medico-legal aspects of dental treatment of the ageing and aged patient. , 2015, Australian dental journal.

[11]  R. T,et al.  Management Of Fractured Endodontic Instruments In Root Canal : A Review , 2015 .

[12]  M. Solomonov,et al.  Fractured endodontic instrument: a clinical dilemma. Retrieve, bypass or entomb? , 2014, The New York state dental journal.

[13]  Simarpreet Singh,et al.  Informed Consent: Corner Stone in Ethical Medical and Dental Practice , 2014, Journal of family medicine and primary care.

[14]  T. Beeson,et al.  Case series: tooth retention 5 years after irretrievable separation of LightSpeedLSX instruments. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  P. Dummer,et al.  Management of intracanal separated instruments. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  H. Duncan,et al.  Clinical decision-making after endodontic instrument fracture , 2013, BDJ.

[17]  H. Duncan,et al.  Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention , 2013, BDJ.

[18]  V. Pinchi,et al.  Trends in endodontic claims in Italy. , 2013, International dental journal.

[19]  E. Zinman Endodontic Records and Legal Responsibilities , 2011 .

[20]  J. Webber Risk management in clinical practice. Part 4. Endodontics , 2010, BDJ.

[21]  I. Tsesis,et al.  Risk management in endodontics. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  J. Radford,et al.  Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes , 2010, BDJ.

[23]  C. Estrela,et al.  Ethical aspects concerning endodontic instrument fracture , 2009 .

[24]  S. Friedman,et al.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study--phase 4: initial treatment. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[25]  G. Cheung,et al.  Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes , 2007 .

[26]  C. Hapcook Dental malpractice claims: percentages and procedures. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[27]  I. Tsesis,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root perforations , 2006 .

[28]  S. Friedman,et al.  Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase III: initial treatment. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[29]  A. Gluskin Mishaps and serious complications in endodontic obturation , 2005 .

[30]  Ya Shen,et al.  Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. , 2004, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[31]  Peter Parashos,et al.  Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[32]  Jeff R Ward,et al.  Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[33]  J F Siqueira,et al.  Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[34]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual , 1991 .

[35]  B. Owall,et al.  Dental malpractice in Sweden. , 1991, Journal of law and ethics in dentistry.

[36]  S. Cohen Endodontic treatment: avoid these malpractice traps. , 1988, Dental management.

[37]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Endodontic complications and the law. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[38]  U. Fors,et al.  Endodontic treatment of root canals obstructed by foreign objects. , 1986, International endodontic journal.