The dual processes hypothesis in mathematics performance: Beliefs, cognitive reflection, working memory and reasoning

Abstract In this paper, using data provided by an empirical study of students in a high school science course, we discuss key variables in the interaction between System 1 (S1) (intuitive and unconscious processes) and System 2 (S2) (analytical and conscious processes) in mathematical reasoning. These variables are: beliefs about oneself and about mathematics; cognitive reflection understood as a self-regulatory skill; working memory; and the evaluation of the deductive and probabilistic reasoning of students. The results confirm the interaction between these variables and their predictive power on performance in mathematics. The study also adds novel considerations related to the function and interaction of cognitive and metacognitive components involved in mathematical performance.

[1]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[2]  J. Gage,et al.  The Shape of Reason , 1988 .

[3]  Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos,et al.  Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification , 2007 .

[4]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[5]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[6]  W. Neys,et al.  Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[8]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[9]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Intuitive Interference in Probabilistic Reasoning , 2006 .

[10]  Wolfgang Schlöglmann,et al.  Beliefs and Attitudes in Mathematics Education: New Research Results , 2009 .

[11]  E. Fischbein,et al.  Intuition in Science and Mathematics: An Educational Approach , 2014 .

[12]  C. Santamaría,et al.  Deductive reasoning and metalogical knowledge in preadolescence: A mental model appraisal , 2013 .

[13]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Naturally Biased? In Search for Reaction Time Evidence for a Natural Number Bias in Adults. , 2012 .

[15]  Nuria Carriedo,et al.  Working Memory, Text Comprehension, and Propositional Reasoning: A New Semantic Anaphora WM Test , 2011, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[16]  Inés María Gómez Chacón,et al.  Creencias de los estudiantes de matemáticas : la influencia del contexto de clase , 2006 .

[17]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Proportional reasoning as a heuristic-based process: time constraint and dual task considerations. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[18]  Gilah C. Leder,et al.  Beliefs A hidden variable in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[19]  Jonathan Evans.  Hypothetical Thinking: Dual Processes in Reasoning and Judgement , 2007 .

[20]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[21]  E. Corte,et al.  Framing students' mathematics-related beliefs: a quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization , 2002 .

[22]  Jonathan Evans.  Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning , 1984 .

[23]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Mainstreams and Perspectives in Research on Learning (Mathematics) From Instruction , 2004 .

[24]  J. A. G. Madruga,et al.  Dos nuevas pruebas de Memoria Operativa de Anáforas , 2009 .

[25]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology , 2009, Human Development.

[26]  R. Zan,et al.  THE PROBLEMATIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2004 .

[27]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[28]  Jonathan Evans.  How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? , 2009 .

[29]  Juan A. García-Madruga,et al.  Mental models in propositional reasoning and working memory's central executive , 2007 .

[30]  Jonathan Evans.  The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  V. Thompson.  Towards a metacognitive dual process theory of conditional reasoning , 2010 .

[32]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  What is all the fuss about , 1997 .