The PDSA cycle at the core of learning in health professions education.

BACKGROUND The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle lies at the heart of continuous improvement and is a redefinition of the scientific method for application to the world of work. HEALTH CARE AS A CONTEXT FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS LEARNING Educational institutions could create the best "quality learning" environments for students by relating closely to health care organizations that create improvement environments for workers. When both become "learning" organizations and develop a relationship with each other, an important product will be the integration of processes for individual and organizational learning. THE PDSA CYCLE AS LEARNING THEORY The PDSA cycle can be an integrating theory for both individual and organizational learning. It shares basic features of well-accepted theory about individual and organizational learning, including the concepts of change and action/reflection. EVALUATING LEARNING THROUGH PDSA CYCLES An illustration is given of one set of implications of the PDSA cycle as learning theory. It describes an alternative way of thinking about the evaluation of learning, which surpasses the traditional emphasis on judgment in evaluation. CONCLUSIONS The potential to place the PDSA cycle at the core of learning in health professions education is great. Contributing factors to this potential include the historical emphasis on the scientific method in health care, the relationship between clinical education and practice, recent improvements in our capacity to define and measure health outcomes, emergent pressures for change in health care and education, and compatible multiple functions of the PDSA cycle.

[1]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[2]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[3]  R. McGarvey,et al.  Pneumonia mortality reduction and quality improvement in a community hospital. , 1993, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[4]  D. Stevens,et al.  Continuous quality improvement and the education of the generalist physician , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  B. Schwartz Psychology of Learning and Behavior , 1978 .

[6]  M. Knowles The adult learner : a neglected species , 1979 .

[7]  E. Hilgard,et al.  Theories of Learning , 1981 .

[8]  J J Mohr,et al.  Improving health care, Part 1: The clinical value compass. , 1996, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[9]  D Neuhauser,et al.  Quality health care. , 1994, JAMA.

[10]  M. Cooper,et al.  Critical pathway methodology: effectiveness in congenital heart surgery. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  P. Batalden,et al.  A framework for the continual improvement of health care: building and applying professional and improvement knowledge to test changes in daily work. , 1993, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[12]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[13]  C. McLaughlin,et al.  Continuous quality improvement for continuity of care. , 1993, The Journal of family practice.

[14]  Barbara A. Cleary,et al.  Orchestrating Learning With Quality , 1995 .

[15]  L. Peterson,et al.  Reduction of unnecessary intravenous catheter use. Internal medicine house staff participate in a successful quality improvement project. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  P. B. Petersen The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education , 1993 .

[17]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .