International and Intra-national Technology Spillovers and Technology Development Paths in Developing Countries: The Case of China

This paper analyses the paths of technology development among regions with heterogeneous economic and technological characteristics, focusing on the case of China. It finds that intra-national technology transfer, that is, the technology transfer from technologically advanced provinces to less advanced ones, is more important than that taking place through FDI in the backward regions. In technologically advanced areas, learning by doing, indigenous R&D and technology transfer from FDI all play a significant role in technical progress. The relationship between the strength of interprovincial technology transfer and technological distance is U-shaped, with the technology threshold falling outside the upper bound of technology distance. This suggests that technology transfer takes place more effectively when technological distance is small. The paper finds that learning by doing and R&D are important internal routes to technical progress. R&D plays a key role in the assimilation of foreign technologies, whereas learning by doing is relevant for the absorption of interprovincial technology transfers.

[1]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[2]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out , 1985 .

[3]  M. Nadiri Contributions and Determinants of Research and Development Expenditures in the U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1979 .

[4]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[5]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment, Absorptive Capacity and Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from China , 2008 .

[6]  T. C. Edens,et al.  Economic Growth , 1957, The Journal of Economic History.

[7]  Maria Luisa Mancusi,et al.  International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations , 2008 .

[8]  Y. Kinoshita R&D and Technology Spillovers Via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity , 2000 .

[9]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates , 1994 .

[10]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[11]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and the Productivity Slowdown , 1980 .

[12]  Michael Gort,et al.  Decomposing Learning by Doing in New Plants , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[14]  A. Kokko,et al.  Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay , 2001 .

[15]  E. Levitas,et al.  The Production, Transfer and Spillover of Technology: Comparing Large and Small Multinationals as Technology Producers , 1997 .

[16]  Alwyn Young,et al.  Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Productivity Convergence and International Openness , 1998 .

[18]  S. Girma Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: A Threshold Regression Analysis , 2005 .

[19]  A. Kokko,et al.  Local Technological Capability and Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan Manufacturing Sector , 1996 .

[20]  D. MacDougall The benefits and costs of private investment from abroad: a theoretical approach , 1975 .

[21]  K. Maskus,et al.  Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options , 2004 .

[22]  D. Parker,et al.  Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in the Chinese manufacturing sector , 2001 .

[23]  M. L. Mancusi,et al.  International Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: A Cross-Country, Cross-Sector Analysis Based on European Patents and Citations. , 2004 .

[24]  Marjolein C. J. Caniëls,et al.  The effects of economic integration on regional growth, an evolutionary model , 1999 .

[25]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[26]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence* , 2005 .

[27]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela , 1999 .

[29]  John L. Enos A Measure of the Rate of Technological Progress in the Petroleum Refining Industry , 1958 .

[30]  R. Findlay,et al.  Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model , 1978 .

[31]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[32]  Xiaolan Fu Exports, Technical Progress and Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing Industries , 2004 .

[33]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[34]  S. Lall Industrial success and failure in a globalizing world , 2004 .