Laboratory method for investigating permeability upscaling

The purpose of this work is to describe, evaluate, and demonstrate a laboratory-based method for physically investigating permeability upscaling. The method makes use of a simple instrument, the gas permeameter, to acquire rapid, precise, and nondestructive permeability measurements from heterogeneous blocks of dry rock. Critical to investigating permeability upscaling is the ability to acquire data at multiple sample supports subject to consistent boundary conditions and flow geometry. Such measurements, spanning almost 4 orders of magnitude on a per volume basis, are made with the gas permeameter by simply varying the size of the permeameter tip seal. The precision and consistency of measurements made in this way were evaluated using a suite of data collected from blocks of three relatively homogeneous materials: Berea Sandstone and two synthetic rocks. Results suggest that measurement error is small (approximately ±1% of the measured permeability) and consistent, and measurements made at different sample supports are free from systematic bias. To demonstrate the ability of this method to measure and quantify upscaling processes, limited data sets were collected with four different-sized tip seals from the Berea Sandstone block. Analysis reveals distinct and consistent trends diagnostic of permeability upscaling relating the sample mean (increased), variance (decreased), and semivariogram to increasing sample support.

[1]  J. Hanor Effective hydraulic conductivity of fractured clay beds at a hazardous waste landfill, Louisiana Gulf Coast , 1993 .

[2]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Outcrop/Subsurface Comparisons of Heterogeneity in the San Andres Formation , 1989 .

[3]  L. Lake,et al.  Effects of stratigraphic heterogeneity on permeability in eolian sandstone sequence, Page Sandstone, northern Arizona , 1989 .

[4]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[5]  T. Dreyer,et al.  Minipermeameter-Based Study of Permeability Trends in Channel Sand Bodies (1) , 1990 .

[6]  C. Keller,et al.  A multiscale study of the permeability of a thick clayey till , 1989 .

[7]  A. J. Desbarats,et al.  Spatial averaging of hydraulic conductivity under radial flow conditions , 1994 .

[8]  J. Sharp,et al.  Permeability and fracture patterns in extrusive volcanic rocks: Implications from the welded Santana Tuff, Trans-Pecos Texas , 1992 .

[9]  G. L. Moltyaner,et al.  Twin Lake Tracer Tests: Setting, methodology, and hydraulic conductivity distribution , 1988 .

[10]  L. Klinkenberg The Permeability Of Porous Media To Liquids And Gases , 2012 .

[11]  R. Giordano,et al.  The Effects of Permeability Variations on Flow in Porous Media , 1985 .

[12]  Fred M. Phillips,et al.  A Portable Air‐Minipermeameter for Rapid In Situ Field Measurements , 1994 .

[13]  Ernest Otto Doebelin,et al.  Measurement Systems Application and Design , 1966 .

[14]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  A stochastic approach to the problem of upscaling of conductivity in disordered media: Theory and unconditional numerical simulations , 1990 .

[15]  J. Sharp,et al.  An Electronic Minipermeameter for Use in the Field and Laboratory , 1994 .

[16]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Generalized scaling of permeabilities: Validation and effect of support scale , 1994 .

[17]  W. Brace Permeability of crystalline rocks: New in situ measurements , 1984 .

[18]  John H. Cushman,et al.  On unifying the concepts of scale, instrumentation, and stochastics in the development of multiphase transport theory , 1984 .

[19]  John L. Wilson,et al.  Architecture of the Sierra Ladrones Formation, central New Mexico: Depositional controls on the permeability correlation structure , 1993 .

[20]  C. Clauser Permeability of crystalline rocks , 1992 .

[21]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifers by the method of embedding matrix: 1. Steady flow , 1981 .

[22]  R. Eijpe,et al.  Mini-Permeameters for Consolidated Rock and Unconsolidated Sand: GEOLOGICAL NOTE , 1971 .

[23]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  A theoretical and experimental analysis of minipermeameter response including gas slippage and high velocity flow effects , 1988 .

[24]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Sample volume effects on solute transport predictions , 1987 .