Cascaded systems analysis of noise and detectability in dual-energy cone-beam CT.

PURPOSE Dual-energy computed tomography and dual-energy cone-beam computed tomography (DE-CBCT) are promising modalities for applications ranging from vascular to breast, renal, hepatic, and musculoskeletal imaging. Accordingly, the optimization of imaging techniques for such applications would benefit significantly from a general theoretical description of image quality that properly incorporates factors of acquisition, reconstruction, and tissue decomposition in DE tomography. This work reports a cascaded systems analysis model that includes the Poisson statistics of x rays (quantum noise), detector model (flat-panel detectors), anatomical background, image reconstruction (filtered backprojection), DE decomposition (weighted subtraction), and simple observer models to yield a task-based framework for DE technique optimization. METHODS The theoretical framework extends previous modeling of DE projection radiography and CBCT. Signal and noise transfer characteristics are propagated through physical and mathematical stages of image formation and reconstruction. Dual-energy decomposition was modeled according to weighted subtraction of low- and high-energy images to yield the 3D DE noise-power spectrum (NPS) and noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ), which, in combination with observer models and the imaging task, yields the dual-energy detectability index (d(')). Model calculations were validated with NPS and NEQ measurements from an experimental imaging bench simulating the geometry of a dedicated musculoskeletal extremities scanner. Imaging techniques, including kVp pair and dose allocation, were optimized using d(') as an objective function for three example imaging tasks: (1) kidney stone discrimination; (2) iodine vs bone in a uniform, soft-tissue background; and (3) soft tissue tumor detection on power-law anatomical background. RESULTS Theoretical calculations of DE NPS and NEQ demonstrated good agreement with experimental measurements over a broad range of imaging conditions. Optimization results suggest a lower fraction of total dose imparted by the low-energy acquisition, a finding consistent with previous literature. The selection of optimal kVp pair reveals the combined effect of both quantum noise and contrast in the kidney stone discrimination and soft-tissue tumor detection tasks, whereas the K-edge effect of iodine was the dominant factor in determining kVp pairs in the iodine vs bone task. The soft-tissue tumor task illustrated the benefit of dual-energy imaging in eliminating anatomical background noise and improving detectability beyond that achievable by single-energy scans. CONCLUSIONS This work established a task-based theoretical framework that is predictive of DE image quality. The model can be utilized in optimizing a broad range of parameters in image acquisition, reconstruction, and decomposition, providing a useful tool for maximizing DE-CBCT image quality and reducing dose.

[1]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  M. Macari,et al.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen , 2008, European Radiology.

[3]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Nelson,et al.  Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  P. Joseph,et al.  Noise considerations in dual energy CT scanning. , 1979, Medical physics.

[6]  B. Yeh,et al.  Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Frederic Noo,et al.  A local shift-variant Fourier model and experimental validation of circular cone-beam computed tomography artifacts. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Analysis of image noise in 3D cone-beam CT: spatial and Fourier domain approaches under conditions of varying stationarity , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: Dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Spektr: a computational tool for x-ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization. , 2004, Medical physics.

[13]  H. M. Parker,et al.  Radiation Quantities and Units , 1972 .

[14]  I. Cunningham Applied Linear-Systems Theory , 2000 .

[15]  Daniel T Boll,et al.  Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition--pilot study. , 2009, Radiology.

[16]  John M Boone,et al.  Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images. , 2008, Medical physics.

[17]  C. McCollough,et al.  Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: three-material decomposition. , 2009, Medical physics.

[18]  Christianne Leidecker,et al.  Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? , 2009, Radiology.

[19]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  R. Alvarez,et al.  A Comparison of Noise and Dose in Conventional and Energy Selective Computed Tomography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  S. Riederer,et al.  Selective iodine imaging using K-edge energies in computerized x-ray tomography. , 1977, Medical physics.

[23]  D. Yang,et al.  A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. , 2011, Medical physics.

[24]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task. , 2006, Medical physics.

[25]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[26]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Three-dimensional NEQ transfer characteristics of volume CT using direct- and indirect-detection flat-panel imagers , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Detection And Discrimination Of Known Signals In Inhomogeneous, Random Backgrounds , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[28]  W. Kalender,et al.  An algorithm for noise suppression in dual energy CT material density images. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[29]  W. Kalender,et al.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies. , 1986, Medical physics.

[30]  J Yorkston,et al.  Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging. , 2011, Medical physics.

[31]  R. Zamenhof,et al.  Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[32]  E. Caoili,et al.  Musculoskeletal sonography technique: focused versus comprehensive evaluation. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients , 2009, Abdominal Imaging.

[34]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[35]  Goran Ristic,et al.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. , 2004, Medical physics.

[36]  A Fenster,et al.  An accurate method for direct dual-energy calibration and decomposition. , 1990, Medical physics.

[37]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Analysis of lung nodule detectability and anatomical clutter in tomosynthesis imaging of the chest , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[39]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Kai Yang,et al.  Noise variance analysis using a flat panel x-ray detector: a method for additive noise assessment with application to breast CT applications. , 2010, Medical physics.

[41]  S. Nicolaou,et al.  Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[42]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[43]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[44]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[45]  C. McCollough,et al.  Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  S. W. Nelson,et al.  Department of radiology , 1966 .

[47]  J Yorkston,et al.  Optimization of image acquisition techniques for dual-energy imaging of the chest. , 2007, Medical physics.

[48]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[50]  R. Cloutier Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[51]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[52]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Comparison of model and human observer performance for detection and discrimination tasks using dual-energy x-ray images. , 2008, Medical physics.

[53]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[54]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[55]  A. Coleman,et al.  A beam-hardening correction using dual-energy computed tomography. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[56]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[57]  R. Brooks A Quantitative Theory of the Hounsfield Unit and Its Application to Dual Energy Scanning , 1977, Journal of computer assisted tomography.