Canopy management to improve fruit quality of Coe Red Fuji, Granny Smith and Spartan varieties of apple (Malus domestica)

Light management within apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) canopies has been an invariable rationale of fruit tree architecture strategy during the development of training systems. This paper attempts to compare fruit quality characteristics of three apple cultivars Coe Red Fuji, Granny Smith and Spartan trained on three canopy architectural engineering (training) system, viz. Espalier, Vertical axis and Cordon were grafted on M 9 rootstock. The maximum fruit weight (210.11g) was observed in Granny Smith and maximum yield per tree (32.11 kg/cm2) and yield efficiency (0.69 kg/cm2) in Coe Red Fuji which may be due to higher crop density. Among training systems, maximum fruit weight (200.12 g), highest yield per tree (36.36 kg) and maximum yield efficiency (0.72 kg/cm2) was observed in espalier training system. The interaction study displayed maximum fruit weight in Granny Smith (210.55g), highest yield per tree in Coe Red Fuji (32.16 kg) and maximum yield efficiency in Spartan on Espalier system. Light interception demonstrated maximum photon flux density (237 µmolm-2 s-1) across the canopy of Spartan with minimum leaf area index (0.30) and among training systems maximum PPFD (221 µmolm-2s-1) was observed in Espalier system with minimum LAI (0.21). Fruit size, TSS and colour parameters of fruits in all varieties were significantly influenced by light intensity. Higher the light intensity, higher was the TSS and colour development in coloured varieties like Spartan and Coe Red Fuji. Therefore, espalier training system was found the best canopy management system allowing maximum PAR penetration and diffusion leading better fruit quality and productivity.

[1]  A. Vian,et al.  Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture , 2016 .

[2]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Mapping interception of photosynthetically active radiation in sweet cherry orchards , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[3]  N. Milosevic,et al.  Tree growth, yield, fruit quality attributes and leaf nutrient content of ‘Roxana’ apricot as influenced by natural zeolite, organic and inorganic fertilisers , 2013 .

[4]  Mario Miranda Sazo,et al.  A Vision for Apple Orchard Systems of the Future , 2013 .

[5]  L. Corelli-Grappadelli,et al.  Light quality management in fruit orchards: physiological and technological aspects , 2012 .

[6]  Robert Faivre,et al.  Investigating the influence of geometrical traits on light interception efficiency of apple trees: A modelling study with MAppleT , 2012, 2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications.

[7]  W. Chow,et al.  Modulating the light environment with the peach ‘asymmetric orchard’: effects on gas exchange performances, photoprotection, and photoinhibition , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[8]  Terence L. Robinson,et al.  The Evolution Towards More Competitive Apple Orchard Systems in the USA , 2008 .

[9]  T. Robinson RECENT ADVANCES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN ORCHARD PLANTING SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[10]  T. Robinson EFFECTS OF TREE DENSITY AND TREE SHAPE ON APPLE ORCHARD PERFORMANCE , 2007 .

[11]  L. C. Grappadelli,et al.  IS MAXIMIZING ORCHARD LIGHT INTERCEPTION ALWAYS THE BEST CHOICE , 2007 .

[12]  O. Arakawa,et al.  Induction of phenolic compounds biosynthesis with light irradiation in the Tesh of red and yellow apples , 2006 .

[13]  John K. Fellman,et al.  Apple Orchard Productivity and Fruit Quality under Organic, Conventional, and Integrated Management , 2006 .

[14]  P. Lauri,et al.  ARCHITECTURAL TYPES IN APPLE (MALUS X DOMESTICA BORKH.) , 2005 .

[15]  Hervé Sinoquet,et al.  Light interception in apple trees influenced by canopy architecture manipulation , 2004, Trees.

[16]  R. Brownlee,et al.  Canopy Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of 'Royal Gala' Apple Trees Grown for Eight Years in Five Tree Training Systems , 2002 .

[17]  Alan N. Lakso,et al.  The Relationship Between Leaf Area and Light Interception by Spur and Extension Shoot Leaves and Apple Orchard Productivity , 2000 .

[18]  Lailiang Cheng,et al.  Light Absorption and Partitioning in Relation to Nitrogen Content in 'Fuji' Apple Leaves , 2000 .

[19]  D. Tustin,et al.  The influence of orchard row canopy discontinuity on irradiance and leaf area distribution iii apple trees , 1998 .

[20]  T. Robinson INTERACTION OF TREE FORM AND ROOTSTOCK ON LIGHT INTERCEPTION, YIELD AND EFFICIENCY OF 'EMPIRE', 'DELICIOUS' AND 'JONAGOLD' APPLE TREES TRAINED TO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[21]  S. Sansavini,et al.  YIELD AND LIGHT EFFICIENCY FOR HIGH QUALITY FRUIT IN APPLE AND PEACH HIGH DENSITY PLANTING , 1997 .

[22]  Y. L. Grossman,et al.  Fruit Tree Light Interception, Simulated Carbon Assimilation, and Carbon Partitioning , 1995 .

[23]  O. Callesen,et al.  Light distribution in apple orchard systems in relation to production and fruit quality , 1995 .

[24]  K. Clayton-Greene Influence of orchard management system on yield, quality and vegetative characteristics of apple trees. , 1993 .

[25]  J. W. Palmer,et al.  Effect of apple tree spacing and summer pruning on leaf area distribution and light interception , 1992 .

[26]  Richard J. Campbell,et al.  Light environment and time of harvest affect 'Delicious' apple fruit quality characteristics , 1992 .

[27]  C. Bünemann,et al.  The International Planting Systems Trial , 1987, HortScience.