Calibrating and validating the LISEM model for two data sets from the Netherlands and South Africa

Abstract Within the framework of the GCTE Soil Erosion Network the Limburg Soil Erosion Model (LISEM) has been tested and validated in two catchments in South-Limburg (the Netherlands) and Zululand (South Africa). The calibration and validation of the Green–Ampt version of the LISEM model using 10 storms from the Catsop catchment in the Netherlands shows that differences in measured and simulated hydrographs and sediment loads can be large. These differences may be caused by the sensitivity of the model to some of the input variables, such as saturated hydraulic conductivity and the initial soil moisture content. Given the uncertainty in the input maps of these variables and a limited number of point data that is used to create these maps, a large part of the differences between measured and simulated data can be explained by these uncertainties. Thus, it is clear that detailed process-based models such as LISEM require very detailed and high-resolution input data in order to produce quantitative reliable results. The runoff processes in the Zululand catchment appeared to be dominated by slow throughflow and groundwater flow, which are processes that are not incorporated in LISEM.

[1]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  A model of the effect of tillage-induced soil surface roughness on erosion , 1988 .

[2]  A. D. Roo,et al.  LISEM: A SINGLE‐EVENT, PHYSICALLY BASED HYDROLOGICAL AND SOIL EROSION MODEL FOR DRAINAGE BASINS. II: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, VALIDATION AND APPLICATION , 1996 .

[3]  R. Young,et al.  AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds , 1989 .

[4]  David Favis-Mortlock,et al.  Modelling Soil Erosion by Water , 1998 .

[5]  Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Application of the EROSION 3D model to the CATSOP watershed, The Netherlands , 1999 .

[6]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Green‐ampt Infiltration Parameters from Soils Data , 1983 .

[7]  C. Valentin,et al.  The GCTE Soil Erosion Network: A multi-participatory research program , 1996 .

[8]  John N. Quinton,et al.  The GCTE validation of soil erosion models for global change studies. , 1996 .

[9]  A. D. Roo,et al.  LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins; I: theory, input and output , 1996 .

[10]  A. D. Roo,et al.  The LISEM project : An introduction , 1996 .

[11]  G. Ampt,et al.  Studies on Soil Physics: Part II — The Permeability of an Ideal Soil to Air and Water , 1912, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[12]  M. G. Anderson.  Modelling geomorphological systems , 1988 .

[13]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[14]  P. Dijk,et al.  Measuring and Modelling of Soil Water Dynamics and Runoff Generation in AN Agricultural Loessial Hillslope , 1996 .

[15]  Reinder A. Feddes,et al.  Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE , 1983 .

[16]  G. R. Foster,et al.  A Process-Based Soil Erosion Model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology , 1989 .

[17]  R. J. Rickson,et al.  The European soil erosion model: an update on its structure and research base. , 1994 .

[18]  A. P. J. de Roo,et al.  Modelling surface runoff and soil erosion in catchments using geographical information systems : validity and applicability of the 'ANSWERS' model in two catchments in the loess area of South Limburg (The Netherlands) and one in Devon (UK) , 1993 .

[19]  C. A. Onstad,et al.  Depressional Storage on Tilled Soil Surfaces , 1984 .

[20]  R. J. Rickson,et al.  Conserving soil resources: European perspectives. , 1994 .

[21]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Simulation of selected events on the Catsop catchment by KINEROS2 A report for the GCTE conference on catchment scale erosion models , 1999 .

[22]  David Favis-Mortlock,et al.  Evaluation of field-scale and catchment-scale soil erosion models , 1999 .

[23]  M. Kirkby,et al.  MEDRUSH and the Catsop basin—the lessons learned , 1999 .