Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive

Abstract Reference conditions are a key concept in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). The WFD stipulates that the ecological status of a given water body shall be assessed by quantifying the deviation from a set of reference conditions that represent the stable state of an ecosystem in the absence of significant human disturbance. This concept is subject to criticism from several authors, particularly because underlying ecological concepts are weak and the distinction between natural variability and the effects of anthropogenic activities on ecosystem function will become increasingly artificial. In this paper, a sociologist and an aquatic ecologist examine the origin, successes and limits of the reference conditions concept and raise important questions about applying this concept in practice. We argue that this concept fitted specific needs from different institutions and stakeholders which promoted the WFD. Monitoring practices using this concept require some adaptations. Setting goals for restoration based on reference conditions is more problematic. A more adaptive management approach would be wiser.

[1]  C. Elton,et al.  Animal ecology and evolution , 1927 .

[2]  Christoph Knill,et al.  Environmental politics in the European Union , 2013 .

[3]  A. Farina The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology and Economics , 2000 .

[4]  A. Tansley The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms , 1935 .

[5]  Francine M. R. Hughes,et al.  Restoring Riparian Ecosystems: The Challenge of Accommodating Variability and Designing Restoration Trajectories , 2005 .

[6]  E. Odum Fundamentals of ecology , 1972 .

[7]  Frederic E. Clements,et al.  Research methods in ecology , 1905 .

[8]  Gabrielle Bouleau,et al.  The WFD dreams: between ecology and economics , 2008 .

[9]  D. Pont,et al.  Conceptual framework and interdisciplinary approach for the sustainable management of gravel-bed rivers: The case of the Drôme River basin (S.E. France) , 2009, Aquatic Sciences.

[10]  Susan K. Jackson,et al.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Isabelle Bruno,et al.  Europeanization through its instrumentation: benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination … toolbox or Pandora's box? , 2006 .

[13]  B. Moss,et al.  The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  W. Howarth,et al.  The Progression Towards Ecological Quality Standards , 2005 .

[15]  G. Bouleau,et al.  Les conditions de référence de la directive cadre européenne sur l’eau face à la dynamique des hydrosystèmes et des usages , 2014 .

[16]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  IS IT TIME TO BURY THE ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT? (WITH FULL MILITARY HONORS, OF COURSE!)1 , 2001 .

[17]  P. Usseglio-Polatera,et al.  A new macroinvertebrate-based multimetric index (I2M2) to evaluate ecological quality of French wadeable streams fulfilling the WFD demands: A taxonomical and trait approach , 2012 .

[18]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[19]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[20]  Claude Amoros,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I. A scientific base , 1995 .

[21]  E. Turnhout,et al.  The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators , 2009 .

[22]  S. Treyer,et al.  Bringing politics back into water planning scenarios in Europe , 2014 .

[23]  C. Lévêque,et al.  L'anthroposystème : entité structurelle et fonctionnelle des interactions sociétés-milieux , 2003 .

[24]  J. Karr Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[25]  D. Pont,et al.  Ecological assessment of running waters: Do macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, diatoms and fish show similar responses to human pressures? , 2012 .

[26]  Á. Borja,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Ralph T. Clarke,et al.  Errors and uncertainty in bioassessment methods : major results and conclusions from the STAR project and their application using STARBUGS , 2006 .

[28]  Andrea Buffagni,et al.  The European reference condition concept: A scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  M. L. Cadenasso,et al.  Landscape Ecology: Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems , 1995, Science.

[30]  S. Dufour,et al.  From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits , 2009 .

[31]  Patrick Steyaert,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive: How Ecological Assumptions Frame Technical and Social Change , 2007 .

[32]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Ingmar von Homeyer Differential Effects of Enlargement on EU Environmental Governance , 2004 .

[34]  Yves Dezalay De la défense de l'environnement au développement durable , 2007 .

[35]  Marc Babut,et al.  How ecological indicators construction reveals social changes—The case of lakes and rivers in France , 2009 .

[36]  C. Radaelli The open method of coordination: a new governance architecture for the European Union? , 2003 .

[37]  J. Omernik Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[38]  Michelle. Cini,et al.  Administrative Culture in the European Commission: The Cases of Competition and Environment , 1997 .

[39]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[40]  Joanne Scott,et al.  Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union , 2002 .

[41]  Andre F. Clewell,et al.  Ecological restoration: A new frontier for nature conservation and economics , 2006 .

[42]  M. M. Moore,et al.  DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS , 1997 .

[43]  R. Ponton Naissance du roman psychologique [Capital culturel, capital social et stratégie littéraire à la fin du XIXème siècle] , 1975 .

[44]  Robert J. Naiman,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Restoring Riverine Landscapes Restoring Riverine Landscapes: The Challenge of Identifying Priorities, Reference States, and Techniques , 2007 .

[45]  G. Bouleau,et al.  La directive-cadre sur l'eau et ses traductions : que nous apprennent les sites « innovants » ? , 2011 .

[46]  Olivier Delaigue,et al.  Uncertainty associated with river health assessment in a varying environment: The case of a predictive fish-based index in France , 2014 .

[47]  S Birk,et al.  Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  Tore Söderqvist,et al.  Regime Shifts and Ecosystem Service Generation in Swedish Coastal Soft Bottom Habitats: When Resilience is Undesirable , 2005 .

[49]  Maria Kaika,et al.  The EU Water Framework Directive: part 1. European policy‐making and the changing topography of lobbying , 2003 .

[50]  A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity , 2000 .

[51]  Stefan Schmutz,et al.  Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters , 2000, Developments in Hydrobiology.

[52]  Thierry Oberdorff,et al.  Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of ‘river health’ in France , 2002 .

[53]  Didier Pont,et al.  Global warming and potential shift in reference conditions: the case of functional fish-based metrics , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[54]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[55]  Terry L. Anderson,et al.  Free Market Environmentalism , 2019 .

[56]  H. V. Rijswick,et al.  European River Basin Districts: Are They Swimming in the Same Implementation Pool? , 2010 .

[57]  S. Pimm The complexity and stability of ecosystems , 1984, Nature.

[58]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Forest reference conditions for ecosystem management in the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico , 1998 .

[59]  L. Buisson,et al.  Contrasted impacts of climate change on stream fish assemblages along an environmental gradient , 2009 .

[60]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  Multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems , 2010 .

[61]  D. Goffaux,et al.  Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: a European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages , 2006 .

[62]  R. Hughes,et al.  Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection , 1988 .

[63]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[64]  Sterling Evans Advances in Historical Ecology. Edited by William Balee. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. xvi + 429 pp. Maps, tables, notes, references, list of contributors, index. $65.00 , 1999 .

[65]  P. Calow,et al.  Rehabilitation of streams in south-west Germany , 1992 .

[66]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Biomonitoring of Human Impacts in Freshwater Ecosystems: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly , 2011 .