A Community-based Partitioning Approach for Phasor Measurement Unit Placement in Large Systems

Abstract A phasor measurement unit placement scheme is developed in this article that ensures complete observability of large systems while reducing the computational burden of optimization. Redundancy in measurement of the critical buses of the network that are identified based on system studies and/or topologies is also provided by the proposed methodology. The community-based islanding approach initially partitions the system into smaller islands. Placement of phasor measurement units in these islands is then computed using integer linear programming. A bound is also developed to find the maximum error from a global optimal solution. The proposed technique is applied to standard IEEE systems as well as on more realistic power system networks. The results indicate that the proposed technique optimizes the benefits of having phasor measurement units at strategic locations of a large power system network without the associated computational burdens.

[1]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  A preprocessing method for effective PMU placement studies , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies.

[2]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Solution for the crisis in electric power supply , 2001 .

[3]  Nikolaos M. Manousakis,et al.  Optimal phasor measurement unit placement for numerical observability in the presence of conventional measurements using semi-definite programming , 2015 .

[4]  James S. Thorp,et al.  A PMU Placement Scheme Ensuring Real-Time Monitoring of Critical Buses of the Network , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  K. Clements Observability methods and optimal meter placement , 1990 .

[6]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Three-phase linear state estimation using Phasor Measurements , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[7]  R. Kavasseri,et al.  Joint Placement of Phasor and Power Flow Measurements for Observability of Power Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Anamitra Pal,et al.  PMU placement for the central american power network and its possible impacts , 2011, 2011 IEEE PES CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES LATIN AMERICA (ISGT LA).

[9]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Realistic Approach for Phasor Measurement Unit Placement: Consideration of Practical Hidden Costs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  Jakob Puchinger,et al.  Combining Metaheuristics and Integer Programming for Solving Cut-ting and Packing Problems , 2006 .

[11]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Placement of PMUs Considering Measurement Phase-Angle Mismatch , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[12]  Jin Xu,et al.  Optimal Multistage PMU Placement for Wide-Area Monitoring , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Rahmat-Allah Hooshmand,et al.  A New Approach for Optimal Placement of PMUs and Their Required Communication Infrastructure in Order to Minimize the Cost of the WAMS , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Virgilio Centeno,et al.  Binary particle swarm optimisation-based optimal substation coverage algorithm for phasor measurement unit installations in practical systems , 2016 .

[16]  Nikolaos M. Manousakis,et al.  Numerical observability method for optimal phasor measurement units placement using recursive Tabu search method , 2013 .

[17]  Ranjana Sodhi,et al.  Phasor measurement unit placement framework for enhanced wide-area situational awareness , 2015 .

[18]  Arun G. Phadke,et al.  Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications , 2008 .

[19]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  The PMU Placement Problem , 2005, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[20]  James S. Thorp,et al.  Synchronized Phasor Measurement Applications in Power Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.