Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We seek to determine the diagnostic test characteristics of noncontrast computed tomography (CT) for appendicitis in the adult emergency department (ED) population. METHODS We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the bibliographies of previous systematic reviews. Included studies assessed the diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT for acute appendicitis in adults by using the final diagnosis at surgery or follow-up at a minimum of 2 weeks as the reference standard. Studies were included only if the CT was completed using a multislice helical scanner. Two authors independently conducted the relevance screen of titles and abstracts, selected studies for the final inclusion, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Consensus was reached by conference, and any disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Unenhanced CT test performance was assessed with summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with independently pooled sensitivity and specificity values across studies. RESULTS The search yielded 1,258 publications; 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1,060 patients. The included studies were of high methodological quality with respect to appropriate patient spectrum and reference standard. Our pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 92.7% (95% confidence interval 89.5% to 95.0%) and 96.1% (95% confidence interval 94.2% to 97.5%), respectively; the positive likelihood ratio=24 and the negative likelihood ratio=0.08. CONCLUSION We found the diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the adult population to be adequate for clinical decisionmaking in the ED setting.

[1]  David J Samson,et al.  Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[3]  L E Moses,et al.  Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  B. Colakoglu,et al.  Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with unenhanced helical CT: a study of 130 patients , 2002, Emergency Radiology.

[5]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  G. Kazemier,et al.  Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  S. Hahn,et al.  Impact of helical computed tomography in clinically evident appendicitis , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[8]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[9]  E. Vamvakas,et al.  Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  P. Babyn,et al.  US or CT for Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children and Adults? A Meta-Analysis. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[12]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  M. Florence,et al.  A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[14]  V. Bari,et al.  Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis. , 2006, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[15]  S. Blamey,et al.  Diagnosis of appendicitis in adults by ultrasonography or computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[16]  D. Fischer,et al.  Focused Helical CT Using Rectal Contrast Material Only as the Preferred Technique for the Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques , 2007, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  P Glasziou,et al.  Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Gerald J Berry,et al.  Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. , 2002, Radiology.

[20]  C. Kasales,et al.  Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  B. Birnbaum,et al.  Appendicitis at the millennium. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  G. Ege,et al.  Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  I. Karavokyros,et al.  Spiral Computerized Tomography: a Diagnostic Aid in Patients with Atypical Acute Appendicitis , 2006, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[24]  G. Casola,et al.  Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings , 2007, European Radiology.

[25]  Teruhiko Terasawa,et al.  Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  A. Işgör,et al.  Can Negative Appendectomy Rate Be Decreased by Using Spiral Computed Tomography without Contrast Material ? , 2002, Acta chirurgica Belgica.

[27]  A. J. Malone,et al.  Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  S. Gamanagatti,et al.  Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2007, Singapore medical journal.

[29]  J. Deeks,et al.  A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[30]  D. Guss,et al.  Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[31]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Simple way to improve accuracy in diagnosis of quadrant inflammatory disease: how to avoid adverse laparotomy by using plain CT. , 2005, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[32]  M. Whiteford,et al.  The rational use of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[33]  Christopher H Schmid,et al.  In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  J. Puylaert,et al.  Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy , 2003, European Radiology.

[35]  Robyn R. Heister,et al.  Impact of helical computed tomography on the rate of negative appendicitis. , 2006, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[36]  H. Smithline,et al.  Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult Emergency Department patients , 2006, Emergency Radiology.

[37]  M. Lane,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis changes disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute appendicitis. , 2002, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[38]  G. Kazemier,et al.  Interobserver variability in CT scan interpretation for suspected acute appendicitis , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[39]  Patrick Bossuyt,et al.  Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[40]  S. Walter,et al.  Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[41]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain , 2009, European Radiology.

[42]  U. Anegg,et al.  Akute Appendizitis im Nicht-Kontrast-Spiral-CT: diagnostischer Luxus oder Nutzen? , 1999 .

[43]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  G. Liu,et al.  Evaluation of significance of clinical information and intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic accuracy during emergent abdominal computed tomographic examination , 1997, Emergency Radiology.

[45]  R. Novelline,et al.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  J. Hamming,et al.  Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  J. Szejnfeld,et al.  The value of unenhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 1998, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[48]  D. Flum,et al.  A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[49]  J. Styrud,et al.  Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[50]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. , 1999, Radiology.

[51]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[52]  Neil M Rofsky,et al.  Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates , 1998, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[53]  Michael A Favata,et al.  Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[54]  M. Boermeester,et al.  Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. , 2008, Radiology.

[55]  C. Peck,et al.  The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[56]  E. Paulson,et al.  Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[57]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  David Moher,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. , 2004, Family practice.